Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36; Roadrunner383
AND? No expansion of thoughts on HOW this lawsuit is all of those things?Or are you just a snipe and run type of poster?

You could write pages and pages and pages recounting all the legal reasoning why certiorari will be denied by the Court, but who in their right mind would want to take the time to do that? Especially when most of the folks reading wouldn't be lawyers and would just dismiss the arguments out of hand anyway?

Although it was mentioned that the Supreme Court, especially one that isn't activist, and isn't going to get rid of the President and most of Congress in one fell swoop. That would be a judicial takeover of mind-boggling proportions. There is literally nothing in the Constitution that gives the Court the power to do that.

33 posted on 12/22/2022 7:25:53 PM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin
There is literally nothing in the Constitution that gives the Court the power to do that.

And rather than prove that assertion, because who wants to spend time doing something fruitful like supporting their argument, one can merely speak a thing and make a thing so.

Got it.

37 posted on 12/22/2022 7:33:52 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson