Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The case did not "bypass the lower courts".

That is a blatant lie.

The lower courts dismissed the case, and the plaintiffs appealed the case.

That is normal procedure.

Now, the Supreme Court will refuse to hear the case, which is what is up next.

I suspect the plaintiffs will come up with some weird excuse as to why the Supreme Court will do exactly what is expected with a case argued by people who have no clue about what they are attempting to do.

2 posted on 12/22/2022 5:41:27 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

What do you think the outcome will be?


3 posted on 12/22/2022 5:43:05 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

The courts always run out the clock. That’s what they were going to do here.

They found a national emergency statute and filed with that. The USSC attorney contacted them and asked them to include more documentation.

See ya on January 6th, but I’m sure you’ll still be blowhard when you are wrong.


4 posted on 12/22/2022 5:47:31 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

You are not quite right either, it was appealed from a lower court ruling where is got stuck in the appeals court for months. Rule 11 was discovered by Loy’s brother, which allowed the case to be submitted to the U.S.S.C. even though the lower appeals court had not yet rendered a ruling, when the case involves a National Emergency.


9 posted on 12/22/2022 5:56:37 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Thanks for calling the liars to task.


11 posted on 12/22/2022 5:58:06 PM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

You are correct. I don’t know why people keep posting this nonsense.


17 posted on 12/22/2022 6:32:02 PM PST by KevinB (Word for the day: "kakistocracy" - a society governed by its least suitable or competent citizens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
Now, the Supreme Court will refuse to hear the case, which is what is up next.

In that case, why would the Clerk of the Court bother with all this?


August 14, 2022
The Supreme Court of the United States
(The brothers realize that they no longer have to wait for a decision from the 10th Circuit of Appeals. The Rule 11 enables them to bypass the 10th Circuit and go straight to the SCOTUS. Their brother Deron spent the past week crafting a perfectly well written petition for writ of certiorari. On this day Deron had his two brothers Loy and Raland fine tune it in preparation for the SCOTUS and the proper format for the printers.)

September 23, 2022
Petition for Writ of Certiorari Received
(The SCOTUS received the petition along with the copies for the Justices.)

September 28, 2022
A phone call from SCOTUS
(The Clerk of the SCOTUS calls Raland requesting for a revision of the Petition that would include more information on the lawsuit and wondering how soon they could get it.)

October 17, 2022
2nd phone call from SCOTUS
(The Clerk of the SCOTUS calls Raland again. She asks "how are you doing on your revision of the Writ with the additional information that we need?" Raland said "We're working on it as we speak!" She said "how soon can we get it?" Raland said "Right away!")

October 20, 2022
Revised Petition shipped to the SCOTUS

October 24, 2022
Petition docketed!
(The clerk of the Court tells Raland that they have everything they need. The U.S. Attorneys have until Nov 23, 2022 to respond showing why the Supreme Court of the United States should not move on this case.)

November 23, 2022
The Solicitor General of the United States Department of Justice replaces the U.S. Attorneys
(Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the Solicitor General of United States, the official attorney on record for the defendants, and in behalf of the 388 defendants, waived their right to respond to this lawsuit, thus allowing the SCOTUS to move forward!)

November 30, 2022
The SCOTUS set the conference date for Jan 6, 2023
(The 9 Justices will meet January 6, 2023 to discuss the case and decide (by vote) if they want to move it to a hearing, where they will oficially judge the case and decide (by vote) if defendants should be removed from office)

23 posted on 12/22/2022 6:52:44 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
The case did not "bypass the lower courts".
That is a blatant lie.

You don't know about Rule 11?
They used the Court's own Rule 11 to bypass the 10th Circuit
who had been sitting on the case for months.

I suggest you better familiarize yourself with the case before opining.

24 posted on 12/22/2022 6:55:30 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Does the Supreme Court routinely contact plaintiffs by phone and coach and encourage to expidite filing to make deadline ASAP???
Listen to (search) interview Sarah Westall Brunson


78 posted on 12/28/2022 6:17:11 AM PST by rick400tec (Please write or call your Senators and Representatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson