Posted on 12/22/2022 5:25:40 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
That is a blatant lie.
The lower courts dismissed the case, and the plaintiffs appealed the case.
That is normal procedure.
Now, the Supreme Court will refuse to hear the case, which is what is up next.
I suspect the plaintiffs will come up with some weird excuse as to why the Supreme Court will do exactly what is expected with a case argued by people who have no clue about what they are attempting to do.
What do you think the outcome will be?
The courts always run out the clock. That’s what they were going to do here.
They found a national emergency statute and filed with that. The USSC attorney contacted them and asked them to include more documentation.
See ya on January 6th, but I’m sure you’ll still be blowhard when you are wrong.
Well, that is not exactly correct. It got stuck in one of the lower Federal Appeals courts (10 I think it was) The one brother researched and found that you could use Rule 11 to expedite the case to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court without the lower court making a ruling. Rule 11 basically says that in a case of National Emergency, rule 11 can be used to present the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, even though the lower court has not yet rendered a ruling.
The following video is an excellent review of the Civil Case being brought, Brunson vs Adams I believe is what the docket name given is:
The Supreme Court will refuse to grant a writ of ceriorari, which is what happens in 99+% of the cases which follow this route.
I am not a lawyer. I was just trying to remember what he said in the interview I heard today. Thanks for explaining it.
Would this apply to President Trump?
You are not quite right either, it was appealed from a lower court ruling where is got stuck in the appeals court for months. Rule 11 was discovered by Loy’s brother, which allowed the case to be submitted to the U.S.S.C. even though the lower appeals court had not yet rendered a ruling, when the case involves a National Emergency.
He’s saying the writ will duly be discussed in conference, however briefly, and immediately fail to receive the required support of no less than four SCOTUS Justices.
This is what happens to the vast majority of Certiorari writs.
Thanks for calling the liars to task.
Thanks for the correction.
I don’t think so, because the Clerk of Court’s office contacted the brothers directly about their Civil Case. This case is what can only be described as being a set of miracles guiding it along through the court system. Watch the video at the link I provided of Loy discussing the case.
Here's a video of the Brunson Brothers History
You are correct. I don’t know why people keep posting this nonsense.
This suit could erase the sovereign immunity of federal elected officials.
I also had no idea there could be and is a Title 28 where as congress gave themselves sovereign immunity to acts of Treason during their course of duties (Sept 1966).
Had to get out my Blacks Law a few times.
BKM for later
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.