Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

This is a silly lawsuit.

The FDA’s position that they have taken on IVM and COVID is probably wrong - but it is State Medical Boards that are disciplining, or not, over prescribing IVM for COVID, not the FDA.

The FDA is a PERMISSIVE agency. For example, they licensed hydroxychloroquine in 1955, giving people who states allow to prescribe PERMISSION to do so. But FDA does not and never has restricted prescribing to the original indication.


34 posted on 06/10/2022 7:23:18 PM PDT by Jim Noble (I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

The problem is the PREP Act, isn’t it.

Congress refused to make Ivermectin a covered countermeasure.

Since it wasn’t, no liability protection existed for prescribers.

The real question is why was Ivermectin left off that list.


36 posted on 06/10/2022 7:47:53 PM PDT by mewzilla (We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

Thanks for clarifying. That was the thrust of my question. What is the tort against the FDA. I agree the state boards are the one who should be sued.


43 posted on 06/10/2022 8:23:07 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

Aren’t the state boards using the FDA as cover?


51 posted on 06/10/2022 11:44:57 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Cv19 vaccines are Phase 2 of the CCP bioweapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson