[gas_dr]

While I found the treatment itself to be largely ineffective, I am glad this tort is being brought. The FDA acted illegally by interfering with physicians prescriptive authority. I think the state boards who took license action should likewise become defendants as they acted illegally.

The question is what is the allegation? Restraint of trade? Tortuous interference? What is the remedy? Hard to prove economic damages and I suppose that punitive damages won’t apply? I agree with the tort but would like to read the complaint. Anyone know how to find r the actual complaint?

[Gene Eric]

Were you diagnosing and treating patients with COVID-19?

Sure, let’s go with both tortuous & tortious interference.

[Honest Nigerian]

Dr. Quackster,
You going to practice law next? At least you seem to be finally admitting that sometimes Ivermectin works. Or did I misread what you said.
Have you come around on how the clot-shot is not a real vaccine? Or that it is not safe and effective? Or that the cardiac damage is real? Real as in statistically significant and excess deaths.
Good to see you survived the most recent wave of injections.

[absalom01]

Heard about this complaint on the "Viva Barnes" podcast last night. There are five counts, but it boils down to the plantiffs alleging that the FDA grossly exceeded its authority (both its enabling act and the administrative procedures act), by urging doctor's to not prescribe an approved drug, and encouraging state and local authorities and professional associations to do the same.

The FDA obviously did those things, and this is filed in the souther district of Texas, so the appeal will go to the 5th circuit, so there might be a slight chance that the courts will somehow limit the FDA to its actual authority.  I'm skeptical, but at least someone is trying to push back.