Posted on 05/04/2022 8:31:18 PM PDT by bitt
Special Counsel Durham Update -
The court order granting immunity to Fusion GPS's Laura Seago has been unsealed.
And here is the newly unsealed motion to compel Seago's testimony [in the Sussmann case], filed by Durham back in April 2022.
Full doc: https://www.scribd.com/document/572850321/72-Motion-to-Compel-Seago-Testimony
Filed 04/19/22
also
Techno_Fog
Special Counsel John Durham just provided the FEC reports detailing how the Clinton Campaign and DNC broke election laws in their payments to Fusion GPS.
Read them here:
https://technofog.substack.com/p/the-clinton-campaign-is-about-to?s=w
Immunity for a FusionGPS underling to rat out what Sussman did? Kool! It seems Sussman lied to the FBI to say he had information about Trump but not on behalf of any client, but now is claiming attorney-client privilege? So he really had a client? Mmmmkay.....
British ex-spy Christopher Steele created a dossier on then-candidate Donald Trump after being hired by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which was itself hired by the Perkins Coie law firm and Marc Elias, the general counsel for Clinton’s campaign.
The judge repeatedly pointed to the difference between hiring a firm to do “fact-checking” versus hiring it to do “opposition research.”
Hillary for America, the DNC, and Perkins argue claims of attorney-client privilege should keep the records concealed and claim Fusion simply provided them legal services.
Durham is insisting those groups played a coordinated role in pushing false collusion claims.
The judge said he didn't doubt Elias’s claims about Fusion being hired to provide legal advice but said that didn’t mean everything Fusion did in 2016 is covered by privilege. The judge said he would review the Joffe records too.
It remains to be seen how the judge will rule on the privilege claims after taking a look at the Alfa Bank-related documents. Thirty are internal Fusion emails, and eight relate to Joffe and Fusion.
I had to read and re-read it again to be sure that I was understanding the arguments presented.
And the democrats will shrug it off, saying “mistakes were made, but there was no intentional malice behind any of it.”
Too bad a couple of these low levelers are accident prone.
The judge said: “How is that assisting Mr. Elias providing legal advice? … That is assisting a media strategy.”
The judge said he was “not convinced” that the Clinton campaign should just have a blanket assertion of privilege.
Scribd has a paywall but in a nutshell, Durham is compelling Laura Seago’s testimony. She will plead the 5th unless Durham gives her immunity, which he is doing except for perjury, false statements etc. as part of her testimony.
Who is Laura Seago?
Fusion GPS’s “Tech Maven” who knows the details of the crimes against President Donald Trump.
“Fusion GPS employee, Laura Seago ..... has knowledge about the company’s decision to craft fake opposition research against then-candidate Donald Trump.”
https://headlineusa.com/fusion-gpss-tech-maven-may-be-forced-to-testify-in-sussmann-case
The case is Hillary Clinton funded and directed an impeachment OVERTHROW plot of a duly elected President of the United States.
Because HRC, as US Senator of NY, took an Oath of Allegiance to the United States and its Constitution, she is subject to charges ot TREASON for attempting to overthrow a duly elected President.
TREASON carries the death penalty.
Suppose three men rob a bank.
What legal mechanism prevents a prosecutor from compelling testimony from each of them regarding the other two, thereby having two witnesses against each defendant?
.
The FBi was snookered.
All the surveillance power and unlimited budget and a spy network around the world and the poor chaps were Bamboozled by a DC Activist Lawyer .
.
Be realistic. It will not be treason. Not a war in progress. And treason requires levying war, means the assembly of armed people to overthrow of the government or to resist its laws.
Thank you for putting this up. I was hoping to find a report on what happened in court today.
“And the democrats will shrug it off, saying “mistakes were made, but there was no intentional malice behind any of it.”
The Court doesn’t care what their intent is. Only if they did it, which they did. There is documentary evidence to prove it and Durham has it.
“Too bad a couple of these low levelers are accident prone.”
Xactly.
I was going to say -
Seth Rich, Richard Haney, Admiral Boorda, Ron Brown, Vince Foster, Jim McDougal, Epstein, etc, etc... didn’t kill themselves.
Treason doesn’t require war. It can also be, and has more often been prosecuted for, not even or just giving aid and comfort to enemies, but to enemies of the subject’s state of residence.
Presumably Durham is just helping Team Obama make certain that 2o24 is cleared for Michelle, without Hillary in there trying to muck things up. Expect prosecutions only for little people as collateral damage.
That’s what everyone, including Durham, wants us to believe. Easier for willing government officials who hated someone like Trump seeking to clean up the swamp to claim ignorance than to be proven to be part of the conspiracy and coverup.
We have been since the AUMF was passed by Congress after 9/11.
It has never been rescinded.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.