(Regardless, why do you completely ignore my response to you that at that time the location of Jesus and the remnant of Israel makes your theory impossible?)
Hardly. He does not bring them back until after Armageddon. His dyed garments (from Armageddon) proves that.
Well at least here, you seem to be responding to my argument even though you talk kind of in riddles and force someone else like me to state plainly what you seem to only hint at.
From your post here you seem to be suggesting the marriage Supper of the Lamb is after Jesus returns to kill the rest of the world and goes and gets Israel's remnant. Then, according to you - I think because you're not really clear - they'll all have the Marriage Supper of the Lamb.
The problem with that is scripture never shows Israel as the Bride of Christ, only the church.
Unless you state your position more plainly with a reasonable and scripture-based argument, as I said at the beginning, I don't think we're going anywhere.
I love talking about this stuff, but only in good faith with those who speak plainly and openly. Not sure we have that here. You've said very little to refute the arguments I've made based on Luke, other scripture, and rationale. The only thing substantive you've said in reply to my argument is your quote I repeated at the beginning of this post which suggests a pretty wild conclusion which you don't say plainly - just hint at.
Hints and allegations suggest a bad-faith argument in which I'm not interested. I love the subject but won't play games twisting things around to suit some wild doctrine or grudge you may have against something or someone.
As Forest Gump said, "That's whole other country."