Someone correct me if I’m wrong. Wasn’t there a study somewhere showing the jab was setting off aids tests as positives? Pretty sure I read that article here.
The report (Jan. 2020), re HIV and SARS-CoV-2
Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1
ABSTRACT
We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag.
Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.
This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.
-
The report may be downloaded from:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1.full.pdf
-
There is now a “WITHDRAWN” watermark on the PDF file pages. That is in regard to criticsm - NOT of the HIV revelations in the report, but - of the report not yet being properly peer-reviewed. IMHO, that specific cause for criticsm, was ignored by too many academics and news media who used the gripe to convey instead, that “experts say” “nothing to see here.”