A cantankerous blogger who calls himself a “cognitive dissident”. He writes: “Question what your hear and read. But do not automatically dismiss what you see.”
But I can manipulate what you see. It’s called TV.
For example, he writes: “It is difficult bordering on impossible (depending on your medical bent) to produce true innoculation against airborne viruses.”
But what if a virus is not contagious or airborne at all? We can not see a supposed airborne virus. So how does this blogger know a virus is contagious? He just assumes it from what he has been told.
You find that incredible?
A cold is how the body rids itself of bad bacteria (food poisoning).
A flu is a self-created virus to rid the body of a toxin by creating a detergent or soap to wash out the toxin called a virus. A virus is not contagious and can only be contracted by 1) injection or 2) by self-triggering.
So, if a person goes to church and is exposed to a toxin in the air conditioning or in food or water, some of the people will self-trigger a virus if their liver gets infected with an overload of detergent and toxins; while others will not get sick because their liver can handle the toxin.
Don’t believe me? Listen to Aajonus Vonderplanitz PhD explain this at the following link
http:// www dot brighteon.com / 35eafba4-2f28-441a-abe4-d3eb877f300c
https://www.brighteon.com/35eafba4-2f28-441a-abe4-d3eb877f300c
Believe that researcher Hulda Clark had similar views.
huh? contagion = virus. That's all it is: a self replicating organism that exploits a host organism. Creation is saturated with a vast variety of them.
Thanks for posting - I appreciate it.