Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: qaz123

The USAF doesn’t want the role, but it doesn’t want to give it the Army. Its weird that way.
The isn’t a new thing. The B-17 was originally designed as flying Coast Defense Artillery. The USN immediately moved to limit how far out to sea the USAAC could attack ships. It took Pearl Harbor to end that dispute.


17 posted on 10/06/2021 11:25:23 AM PDT by Little Ray (Civilization runs on a narrow margin. What sustains it is not magic, but hard work. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray

The B-17 was originally designed as flying Coast Defense Artillery. The USN immediately moved to limit how far out to sea the USAAC could attack ships.


From what I’ve read, the Navy turned out to be right. B-17 turned out to pretty poor in the role it was designed for—attacking/sinking ships.


30 posted on 10/06/2021 11:52:09 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson