As have said on another thread— you are circling in on the need for the separation of what Sidney has found from the legal avenues taken by the Campaign. The presence of a foreign actor makes the Election Fraud by definition a National Security matter— that can trigger other actions, all within the Constitution and current US Statute on National Security. The current president has this responisiblity, but is also a candidate for re-election—which is two separate items,and should be in legal tactics.
Actions threatening national security include tampering with the voting infrastructure, and the potential fraudulent false “election” of proven foreign agent who may not take office. That is, being prevented from taking office. See how hard the vested interest of Clowns in Action are working in protecting and covering up their potential fraudulent actions within the US— highly illegal... and frankly covering a whole lot of what they have done over the last 20 years. Like dominoes— falling, and having their spec ops chain of command taken away from them— iow if they still do them and don’t inform command— they will be put under UCMJ arrest.
Very different from the Equal Protection of the Voter approach for legal arguments before SCOTUS.
I agree. And given the ENORMITY and MAGNITUDE of the election crime that needs to be proven, litigation will take a long period of time. Sidney herself says the evidence is so overwhelming that she likens them to water coming out of a fire hose.
Unfortunately, Trump’s team does not have the luxury of time! The electors have to convene by mid December and they can’t let Sidney’s bigger case distract them from the urgent matter at hand.
That is why they decided to cut Powell loose for her to pursue the global case separately.