[Southside_Chicago_Republican]

Bookmark

[tinyowl]

I think there is a chance SCOTUS concurs a state election is invalid in concept but can offer no remedy so sends it to the state with a love note that says 'the remedy is for the legislature(s)' because though we concur it was fraudulent and the nature of the fraud points to the plaintiff having one, we can not ourselves declare him the victor because we can't extrapolate the fraud votes from the rest of the legit pool in order to order a recount with the fraud removed.

Or not ... that's just an intuitional outcome, I am not a constitutional lawyer. It's not all that different from what this guy is saying except that I don't think it requires the logic this writer employs.

[ifinnegan]

I love this.

Dems have argued for the states to appoint electors not based on the state’s vote.

[ChronicMA]

one of the criticisms of the Popular vote compact is the lack of a fool proof standard of determining the winner. If the state officials can not determine the validity of a count because of unreliable data from some states, they can decide for themselves who they determine was the national popular vote winner, and states within the compact could end up declaring different winners based on each’s independent review of the data.

[MHGinTN]

The little commie turd who wrote this screed needs to be flushed ... one body part at a time, until he is in the sewer he is working for.

[JoSixChip]

This was a coordinated effort across many states. That is a federal issue.