It’s just to keep the rioters stirred up until Trump wins and the Rats claim that the 400 EC votes he wins are somehow illegitimate.
Isn’t it obvious? The Democrats know they have already lost any legitimate election and are planning to use massive numbers of mail-in ballots to steal key swing states. They are conditioning the American public to accept the notion that any push-back against this fraud is “Trump refusing to leave office”.
You know all those ridiculous polls that show Biden being so far ahead when every indication (yard signs, rally attendance, online views etc) show him to way behind? See above.
“ To some extent, this may be projection.”
It is projection
I was on Seeking Alpha today and got hammered...quite a few Biden supporters/Trump haters there. And I mean they really hate him. Some are vets.
One thing was the act that Obama passed in 2014 to help clean up the VA - apparently Trump claimed he did it when really all he did was extend it? A few people there seemed to be happy that POTUS hasn’t started any new wars & is bringing troops home.
I voted for Trump for results and I think he’s doing pretty well particularly with the hurricane velocity headwinds. I get the feeling is the main objection they have with POTUS is his personality/character and not his results as POTUS. Seems that hatred is stronger than logic.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
They’re just trying to make overthrowing the govt look legal.
They are planning on overwhelming fraud. They have to set Trump up when he launches an investigation into the fraud to get him to back off. That they are planning a huge CHEAT is the actual issue and news.
They still haven’t accepted the 2016 results.
This is reminiscent of the wars in the mid-1700s over the legitimacy of the English King.
The Jacobite Rebellion.
It failed.
Campaign tactic so when Trump wins they’ll keep wanting to throw him out and call him illegitimate
Fallback position, they know they lost the race already and can’t recover.
Making stuff up to make Trump seem unhinged. We heard this before the last election.
Of course the people who wouldn’t accept the election were the demonrats.
We kept hearing from MSMers putting on their best fake Anxiety Faces and pontificating about how scared to death they were for America, because "when" Hillary won (not "if" but "when"), there'd be a full blown Constitutional Crisis if Trump contested the results of the election.
And, like, DUH! Surprise surprise. As always, it was *they* who all along planned to treat us to 4 years of _resistance_ to Trump, denying the legitimacy of his election in a hundred different ways.
I think they are doing it to set the table for massive fraud to try to steal the election using vote by mail or other ways. So when a recount goes on and on they can say “Look Trump is refusing to leave just like we said he would!” And even if he prevails they have smeared his second campaign with him being the cheater and illegitimate.
But remember they tried the same gambit in 2016! Remember during the debate when he said he would not necessarily accept the results and simultaneously all of the MSM outlets posted blaring headlines about it. I remember thinking “what a strange question to ask.” It seemed so lut of left field. And they didn’t ask Hillary the same question (although she did contest the results).
Yes it is a very unusual narrative they are creating with this and there can be no good, honest reason for it.
People are reading too much into Hillary Clinton’s comment last week - saying that “Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances”.
That was not Hillary Clinton revealing the DNC’s latest grand strategy - that was just her making everything about herself - as usual.
That was just another way of saying (for the hundredth time) that SHE should never have conceded - that she should be President.
Everything is always has to be about her.
Who was it who said, “Repeat the big lie often enough...”
It is my understanding that the electors (as many as are available) will meet in December to elect the president. If some states are bogged down in a msil-in vote fiasco, too bad. They won’t be voting.
If there is no EC majority, that is when the house system will take effect to determine a president — one vote per state.