Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: usnavy_cop_retired

The other big thing is the jury was tainted and looking more and more like the jury foreman was a plant.


47 posted on 02/14/2020 6:27:16 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

Judge Jackson is going to have no choice but to delay sentencing and hold a hearing on the motion, (the second since the first was denied), for a new trial because of jury misconduct. The first motion concerned a juror who was/is associated with the IRS, (no other details of the bias given that I have read), but this one, on top of the first, will make it impossible for the judge to easily brush aside. I expect that Barr’s folks will not contest a motion for a new trial, and possibly a venue change out of DC.


49 posted on 02/14/2020 7:07:24 AM PST by usnavy_cop_retired (Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson