Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

Having been in a similar situation on the job, I can empathize. The problem is in some jurisdictions, chemical devices (Mace) are also illegal. In our municipality it was covered under our long-gun ordinance. So you have to be careful no matter what happens.

In your scenario, I could see a defense attorney argue that just because you were surrounded by 8 subjects, it may not justify the use of deadly force. Especially, if none of the 8 were armed with a weapon. As hard as that is to believe, a good defense attorney will argue that the other 7 were there by “happenstance” and were only there to “watch”.

There are no easy cut and dried answers which is why pulling a weapon should only be a last resort response.


94 posted on 12/26/2019 2:20:15 PM PST by offduty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: offduty

In my scenario...a lawyer could argue anything he wanted. When 8 guys start to surround you and you are many miles from help, what a lawyer could argue in court doesn’t matter. And let’s face it, no one picks a fight using a 6-shot 22 LR against 8 guys....

As it was (decades ago), I left and never filed any report. I seriously doubt they did. They didn’t strike me as liking cops, so to speak. I’ve never come close to pulling a gun in self-defense since.


96 posted on 12/26/2019 2:28:53 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson