Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN Scolds Lockhart for Saying Democrats Might Be Seeking Impeachment Pause
NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 12/05/2019 9:57:23 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

The CNN troops are all revved up and ready to go for impeachment: face paint on, warrior chants in the break room. The last thing CNN would want would be to demoralize the troops with talk of a possible pause in the inexorable march toward impeachment!

And so it was that Joe Lockhart, who served as Bill Clinton's press secretary during his impeachment, got his knuckles rapped when, appearing on this morning's New Day, he suggested that the Democrats might be seeking a deal with the Trump White House for a pause in the impeachment proceedings. The deal would offer the pause in return for the White House's agreement to provide documents, and testimony by White House aides.

Get the rest of the story and view the video here.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: alisyncamerota; impeachment; joelockhart; johnberman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2019 9:57:23 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Lockhart obviously has inside info. They don’t have the votes and they are flailing over what to do next.


2 posted on 12/05/2019 9:58:50 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein; patro; abb; SE Mom; HarleyLady27; connyankee; Behind Liberal Lines; ...

Watch Lockhart get scolded when he suggests Democrats might be seeking a deal to pause impeachment proceedings.

Ping to Liberal Media Criticism list.

PS: and yes, since Lockhart’s appearance, Pelosi did announce that they were proceeding with articles of impeachment. But that could also be a tactic trying to up the pressure on the White House.


3 posted on 12/05/2019 9:59:39 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (FReep mail me to be added to my Liberal Media Criticism ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I think if the Rats try and weave in Russia as the motivation for impeachment (the Mueller crap), they won’t have the votes. It will be a bridge too far.


4 posted on 12/05/2019 10:01:19 AM PST by Gahanna Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
The deal would offer the pause in return for the White House's agreement to provide documents, and testimony by White House aides.

"See, here's the deal: we want to impeach you. We want that very much. But, right now, we don't have any evidence. Heck, to be honest, we can't even come up with a crime you've committed. So, here's our proposal -- let's take a pause, and you can provide documents and testimony that might help us impeach you. Then we can resume and try to screw you over in a few months. That would work for us. Would that work for you?"

5 posted on 12/05/2019 10:02:25 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Exactly.


6 posted on 12/05/2019 10:06:47 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

That’s my guess. Nancy is drunk and pissed for a reason (but I repeat myself)


7 posted on 12/05/2019 10:06:59 AM PST by gr8eman (Stupid should hurt! Treason should hurt more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

George Soros and the foreign governments he works for must be absolutely amazed at how little they have to pay the whores at CNN to try to destroy our country.


8 posted on 12/05/2019 10:07:04 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Honestly, it's way, way past time to replace the news establishments with modernized alternatives. The connectivity of society is such that we can develop huge networks of reporter citizens, from around the globe. There is no need for a large organization paying large numbers of foreign and domestic correspondents. It could be set up in a way such that citizens who provide credible information that is verified will get paid from online advertising revenue.

It's doable. Today's ‘journalists’ have made this a necessity. They don't report facts without their own spin. They don't do investigative reporting - unless it fits their ideology and narrative, and they are much more interested in their byline or face time on television than they are on professionalism. They've failed society, and need to be marginalized.

9 posted on 12/05/2019 10:11:08 AM PST by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

What exactly is “abuse of power”? This is what they were touting yesterday. Is it a catchall phrase they can throw anything they want to in, or does it have a specific definition that is in a statute that can be adjudicated?


10 posted on 12/05/2019 10:12:14 AM PST by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative

They’ve also been saying “Obstruction of Congress” which is equally silly and made-up.


11 posted on 12/05/2019 10:15:26 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Mr. President, don’t even give them the steam off your shit!

(Movie reference)


12 posted on 12/05/2019 10:30:03 AM PST by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Lord, what the hell kind of movies do you watch?


13 posted on 12/05/2019 10:51:58 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

My super secret source said “NO DEALS”


14 posted on 12/05/2019 11:42:44 AM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gahanna Bob

It could very well be that Nancy knows she doesn’t have the votes and is letting this play out to get the Democrats out of this predicament.

Consider this: Nancy knows Schiff blew it in the Intelligence Committee hearings and Nadler’s choice of Pamela Karlen as a witness who bullied Barron Trump alienated a lot of independents in their little drama yesterday. She is also well aware there are 31 seats in Trump-leaning districts now held by Democrats, that could be in jeopardy.

So, draft Articles of Impeachment, bring them to a floor vote, let the 31 Dems vote against the Articles and it’s a win-win for Nancy.

She can claim to the far-left constituency she “tried” to bring a case against Trump but because of the 31 no-votes, it didn’t go forward. She also provides cover for the 31 so they can claim the evidence wasn’t there to impeach and this will, hopefully, mollify the Trump voters to re-elect the Dems to those seats and she retains the Speakers position.

Pelosi knows it’s highly unlikely 20 Republicans in the Senate are going to vote to convict Trump. Especially in an election year. She also knows her boy Schiff has way too many skeletons in his closet that could turn this impeachment upside down in a hurry and she could lose the majority for several cycles and she would get the blame.

This is certainly a “left-field” theory, but at the end of the day, all Nancy cares about is retaining the Speakers position and she knows she will lose it if impeachment goes forward.


15 posted on 12/05/2019 11:59:56 AM PST by offduty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Here's a deal...


16 posted on 12/05/2019 12:03:46 PM PST by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: offduty

It could work out that way. Many think Pelosi wouldn’t bring articles to the floor if she didn’t have the votes. That makes sense to me.

At Pelosi’s age and her diminishing capacity, I don’t see her looking beyond this congress as speaker.


17 posted on 12/05/2019 12:38:23 PM PST by Gahanna Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

“The deal would offer the pause in return for the White House’s agreement to provide documents, and testimony by White House aides.”

ridiculous “deal” proposal. we’re going to get all the documents and testimony we need to destroy the Dems in the Senate ... Trump and the rest of us want the Dems to poop or get off the pot ASAP, because regardless of their next step, they’ve already set into motion the forces that will destroy the Dem party in 2020 ...


18 posted on 12/05/2019 12:47:04 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

NO WAY can POTUS waive privilege.


19 posted on 12/05/2019 12:47:59 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

So, CNN will only allow certain “rumblings” on the shows, and not others (that they don’t want spoken).

Further verification that CNN/MSM believe THEY are driving.


20 posted on 12/05/2019 1:34:46 PM PST by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and so few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson