Hillary Clinton and The Giant Rake

New Right Network ^ | October 6, 2019 | Gary Gindler

[WWII_Historian]

As it is known, the “Russiagate” is closed. However, it is not just closed. It ended with a deafening failure of the American intelligence services, which in 2016 were getting help from Russian, Ukrainian, Australian, British, Estonian, Czech, and Italian intelligence services. At this point, we must make a reservation: all these intelligence services worked exclusively against Trump, and only one of them, Russia, worked against both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. The proof is a new dirty business—instead of failed Russiagate, Washington is seething today with Ukrainegate. Of course, Ukrainegate was born just because of the botched Russiagate.

At first glance, both pseudo-scandals, Russiagate and Ukrainegate, have nothing in common. However, they have the same origins: Hillary Clinton.

Let us recall that during the 2008 election campaign, the main opponent of Hillary Clinton was her Democratic Party comrade, then-leader of the ratings, Barack Obama. And then suddenly, there was an assertion that Obama was allegedly born, not in America, but in Kenya (which would have immediately disqualified him from the White House bid). As we now know, this fake-out was fabricated by Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

In the 2016 election campaign, Donald Trump was the main opponent of Hillary Clinton. And then suddenly, everyone was talking about an accusation that Trump was allegedly Putin’s puppet, so Russiagate was born. As we now know, this fake news was also made-up (and paid for) by Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The bulk of dirty material for the “Russian dossier” on Trump was a clever dump of disinformation by Russian intelligence services.

At this stage of the 2020 election campaign, Hillary Clinton’s main adversary is her ideological comrade, former Vice President Joe Biden. No wonder we suddenly obtain information that Biden’s son Hunter was involved in some kind of dirty business in Ukraine.

[Verginius Rufus]

Bill Clinton may be a rake, but I wouldn’t call him a giant.

[HighSierra5]

I believe B.O. was born in Hawaii and the supposed father is not the real father. Frank Marshall Davis is the real dad and that’s why they wanted to keep it secret. The handlers didn’t want it known that B.O. was a bastard. That’s just my theory.

[relictele]

Hillary goes about 2 bills with the back truss so that rake is going to smack her hard.

[ptsal]

Still a bastard....without regard to the actual parentage.

[Verginius Rufus]

Barack could clear up the mystery by taking a Y-DNA test and getting one of Barack Sr.'s known sons in Kenya to take the same test. It's possible that Davis is his real father but Stanley Ann must have convinced Barack Sr. that he was the father.

If Barack became an Indonesian citizen at some point, would that have been noted on his birth certificate? There must be some reason why the original version was never made public and they issued the fake one. If Davis was the father that would not appear on the birth certificate if Stanley Ann asserted that Barack Sr. was the father.

[Robert DeLong]

Interesting theory. I guess we will know more as we move closer to the election. If Hillary becomes the nominee, then it may well be an accurate construct he has developed here.