Why isn’t the UN bothering Japan or S. Korea or a number of other countries that have almost ZERO diversity?
Diversity is good at a buffet.
In countries, not so much.
Diversity and discrimination are very interesting subjects. The world seems to want more of one and none of the other. In my mind the world doesn’t know what’s good for it. We need far less diversity and a whole lot more discrimination, and I’m not talking about the kind most leftists are interested in but the kind exercised by thoughtful folks concerned about certain conditions in this world that would never be discussed in polite society nor tolerated for that matter were the true meaning of discrimination not bastardized and forbidden by the all knowing left.
“Diversity is good at a buffet.
In countries, not so much.”
That is true, but why is it true? Answering that question will tell you what’s wrong with the “diversity is our strength” bumper sticker.
Diversity is also good in availability of car colors, sizes, types etc.
The reason for that is because people don’t agree on what color or size is best. There is no best color or size. People’s choice depends on their needs or wants.
But is diversity good in, say, choosing a doctor? No. Any sane person would want the BEST doctor, they couldn’t care less about his height, hair color or skin color.
So diversity is good when the thing in question has no objective quality. It cannot be ranked from worst to best, such as car color. Diversity is bad when the thing in question CAN objectively ranked from worst to best, such as doctors, or mechanics, or teachers.
So the general rule is that diversity is good for those things that cannot be objectively ranked on quality. It is bad for things that can objectively be ranked on quality.