Posted on 06/28/2019 9:14:07 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot
I think “arbitrary and capricious” would imply contrary to the original intent of Congress, or contrary to simple reason or clear evidence. Otherwise, one person’s “carefully considered” could always be another’s “arbitrary and capricious”, and the law would be pointless, a matter of the court’s whim. The Chief Justice seems to be playing that game.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.