Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Saving Private Ryan” Re-released for the 75th Anniversary of D-Day
Special Operations ^ | 1998 | Steven Spielberg

Posted on 05/23/2019 5:09:10 AM PDT by srmanuel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: COBOL2Java

I have always held that one in high regard...I thought it was well done.


41 posted on 05/23/2019 9:47:42 AM PDT by rlmorel ("And she woulda made it, too...if she hadn't been wearing her Lucky Ham." RIP Tim Conway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN
So sorry jerks ruin your experience. Civility and courtesy are at a low ebb in our modern society and that speaks for the poor parenthood of these individuals.

Kevin Bacon is a national treasure - people laugh at the "Seven Degrees Of Bacon" thing overlooking the tremendous work that got him to a living meme.

Check out "The Last Detail" if you haven't seen it.

42 posted on 05/23/2019 10:06:38 AM PDT by MikelTackNailer (NRT, NewRome Tacitus, just don't call me late to dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Reily
Wasn’t the Falaise Pocket the first large scale tactual use of strategic bombers? If I remember this right, massed German armored formations were obliterated by Allied carpet bombing.
Not according to our guide. That had been tried earlier - with mixed results. It really messed up whatever it hit - but “friendly fire” proved so likely that tactical use of carpet bombing was not used at Falaise. There was a midair collision between two of the fighters which were strafing the Germans at Falaise, and the jawbone of one of them was only identified in this century . . .

A previous tactical use of heavy bombers resulted in the death of an American general, whose class ring was found on a piece of his finger - which is all that is buried in his grave at the American cemetery.

It certainly would’ve been the perfect target, if they had been able to hit it with the heavies. But they didn’t dare try. They didn’t want to get obliterated themselves. Apparently the heavies didn’t dare to fly low enough over such a heavily armed target to be really accurate.

The claims of super accuracy for the Norden bomb sight were hype. A good piece of equipment, doubtless - but inherently subject to limitations which were far more important than the hype would admit of.


43 posted on 05/23/2019 10:19:42 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Interesting!
That contradicts stuff I have read.


44 posted on 05/23/2019 10:25:41 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Reily
Wasn’t the Falaise Pocket the first large scale tactual use of strategic bombers? If I remember this right, massed German armored formations were obliterated by Allied carpet bombing.
No. The heavies were used, to mixed effect, earlier in the Battle of Normandy. Carpet bombing obliterated whatever it hit, but unfortunately it was all too prone to hit the good guys. One American general’s finger - which had his class ring on it so it was easily identified - is all that is buried in the American cemetery near Omaha Beach (which was used for all American military killed anywhere in Normandy). Subsequent tactical use of heavy bombers was done with extreme caution - and, according to our tour guide, not at all at Falaise.

The Norden bombsight was doubtless a fine piece of equipment, but it was subject to inherent limitations and could not remotely live up to the hype. As you would know if you thought for a moment about the transformation which the smart bomb made in military affairs, many decades, and many generations of computerized bombsights, after WWII.


45 posted on 05/23/2019 10:36:59 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel
Unlike many here I thought that Private Ryan was excellent.I never saw it as a documentary and don't recall it ever having been billed as a documentary.

And also unlike many Freepers I don't have any combat experience.Perhaps if I had I'd have a different opinion about the film.

46 posted on 05/23/2019 2:34:00 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (A joke: Comey,Brennan and Lynch walk into a Barr...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I saw “Black Hawk Down” with my Son-In-Law and daughter (both Army vets). They believed it was very accurate (S-I-L was infantry. He did tours of duty in Iraq and Djibouti).


47 posted on 05/23/2019 3:47:04 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (AOC: The brain of a tea bisquit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

I can certainly believe it. Kudos to your SIL...


48 posted on 05/23/2019 6:33:51 PM PDT by rlmorel ("And she woulda made it, too...if she hadn't been wearing her Lucky Ham." RIP Tim Conway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson