Posted on 05/22/2019 2:00:58 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
So?
New home in America:
Just like old home in Sh!+holeia
Who’d a thunk it???
That isn't true if they have been supported on the public teat. You would have to take into account the support benefits they receive from the US Government. You might also wish to take into account the increased benefits the US government has to pay to those workers displaced by low-wage illegal labor.
This is exactly what Canada does.
Persecution?
Lets hope they are saving for the TRIP HOME!
Perhaps they should return home.
No argument that government intrusions distort the free market. But then again either you believe Milton Friedman or you don’t. The $150 billion reflects surplus total income. Some of that income could have originated from misguided government interventions. Still if they are truly working they are creating far more wealth than that $150 billion. Probably by a factor of 7.
The political enfranchisement of women has almost destroyed Western Civilization...pathos vs logos
They are “ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS” Get it?
Good news!
Good work, Mr. President!
A friend’s daughter who had a student Visa to Germany had to not only not have any government assistance, but had quarterly meetings with the government to prove they had enough money on-hand to support themselves - which had to be in an account in Germany.
Good. Just the threat is already saving us money.
Good. Then they can go back home.
“and come in the lawful way.”
No. We’re full.
1 in 7 wow, and the 6 others collect their benefits under multiple aliases.
I don’t think Milton Friedman would have ignored the netting out of government benefits. Sure, the illegals have surplus total income. But if that surplus came largely out of the taxpayer’s pocket, there may be relatively little wealth creation. The devil is in the details.
I certainly appreciate the concept of “they earned it, its theirs.” But, that doesn’t apply if they received subsidies in housing, food stamps, education for family members and medical benefits that were comparable to their income. In that case, what has happened is that the cost of employment has been partially shifted from the employer (who benefits from their below market wages) to the taxpayer (i.e., you and I).
Again, the relative size of the numbers matters.
It’s a thing called monetary velocity, which relative to the US economy goes to zero when sent abroad. All that money which would have been spent back into the system creating new wealth here is gone.
I would never move to another Country and expect their taxpayers to provide for me financially to live there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.