[CharlesWayneCT]

So, this is a "NationalSentinel" article. But this article just rehashes what they read from "ILoveMyFreedom". Which just rehashed what they read from Breitbart. Which just rehashed an article from "Spectator / USA". Which MENTIONS the study, but provides no link to the study. 4 articles, not a single piece of factual information, just people putting their own words to someone else's work.

The actual paper? The Rise of Trump, the Fall of Prejudice?

"We find that via most measures, white Americans' expressed anti-Black and anti-Hispanic prejudice declined after the 2016 campaign and election, and we can rule out even small increases in the expression of prejudice. "

But this is just the abstract. You'd need an SSRN account to get to the paper. I wonder if any of the articles written actually did that, or just read the abstract.

Meanwhile, the authors of the study claim that "These results suggest the limits of racially charged rhetoric's capacity to heighten prejudice among white Americans overall. " -- in other words, they are still convinced that Trump has increased racially charged rhetoric, but that it "surprisingly" has not made white people more racist.

[lepton]

Thanks for digging that out...though it’s clear that the researchers fail to adequately discriminate between things PDJT says, and what Liberals say he says, or between people who engage in illegal immigration and the whole of their ethnic/ actionable group.

[KittyKares]

But this is just the abstract. You’d need an SSRN account to get to the paper. I wonder if any of the articles written actually did that, or just read the abstract.
_____________
I got it free. I’m not going to read all that, but you seem interested.

https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=068096001126025103068092112114124117122011005035010028104088106024122017074005069091031007000042033007027068113096121004118066049007088022007111085096115123094109105024020000022077022117001065094093118095072000002004097100125079084102107081104116073091&EXT=pdf