Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: mgray
Interesting theory, but the counterargument is that you don't fire your ammo until after you need to counteract a market shock. Cutting now in advance of a "potential" shock wouldn't work and would more likely spook the market into thinking that the Fed knows something so dire about the economy that it would take such unprecedented preemptive action.

Personally, I believe any "indictment shock" would be very short lived to be followed by a genuine boom once people realize that the Rule of Law is being reestablished.

17 posted on 05/06/2019 1:20:41 PM PDT by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AustinBill

Interesting theory, but the counterargument is that you don’t fire your ammo until after you need to counteract a market shock. Cutting now in advance of a “potential” shock wouldn’t work and would more likely spook the market into thinking that the Fed knows something so dire about the economy that it would take such unprecedented preemptive action.

Personally, I believe any “indictment shock” would be very short lived to be followed by a genuine boom once people realize that the Rule of Law is being reestablished.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

making sense AB


20 posted on 05/06/2019 3:11:21 PM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson