Posted on 03/30/2019 7:05:12 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Who will investigate the investigators?”
The Mueller Nothing Burger Report vindicated President Trump, but our attention now must turn to investigating the last days of the Obama Administration.
Targets of the Special Counsel were persecuted by aggressive prosecutorial practices designed to win capitulations. Mueller team members threatened “suspects” with separate investigations of family members and others risked being buried by legal briefs from lawyers who possessed unlimited government budgets. The reckless machinations of the Special Counsel Office again validates the virtues of limited government: in this case, not to attract and nurture those seeking personal aggrandizement and consolidation of power within the Deep State.
Obama brought corrupt Chicago politics to Washington DC from his first day. His illegal efforts to elect HRC and overthrow Trump did not begin in his "last days."
Concentration of power always leads to corruption. When it happens in government, there’s no balancing authority to dismantle it. It just gets worse. Enron is gone, Global Crossing is gone, but the IRS and the FBI will just move some people around and say the problem has been solved, then continue as inefficiently and malignantly as before.
Not just the LAST days, but the whole damn shemozzle of this illegal usurper and his foreign cronies from start to finish.
True.
Disband almost all of it.
Mueller Report Shows Big ***DEMOCRAT*** Government Unsafe at Any Speed.
Corrected for your safety.
Journalism profits by promoting bad news, and bad news always suggests the need for bigger government.Wire service journalism is monopoly journalism. It is because of Big Journalism’s monopoly power that all reporters toe the Big Government line.
The purpose of the American tradition of free and fair journalism (that is, journalism which is free but subject to libel law) is to “Let a hundred flowers bloom, let a hundred thoughts contend.” The purpose of monopolistic journalism is precisely the opposite. The New York Times v. Sullivan decision pretty much takes libel suits by politicians off the table, but since Democrats don’t get libeled, that only affects Republicans. Sullivan essentially entitles the Democrats to their own facts, and gives the Party of (Big) Government the high ground.
That is precisely the opposite of preventing government from censoring journalism.
Only an idiot nation would give the unheard of power USA has given to DC and its deep state _intelligence_ operations. There is no way whatsoever to control what these operations do. Being compartmentalized and empowered at the cell level, they supposedly do whatever they think will _protect_ USA. This system thinks it _is_ our government and has no _actual_ oversight.
Trillions of dollars have feed it and it invested those dollars in covert, black-market activities to increase those earnings by say 10 times or more.
Sadly this horrifying genie, is not willing to go back into the bottle.
Censoring journalism happens when journalism becomes a party member and they do that ends true fair journalism.
Most of them can not and will not report honestly one has to filter out the trash and find the truth it’s about the only place to find fair journalism is off shore reports.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.