[\/\/ayne]

It's kind of funny how people used to say to evolution unbelievers, "No, no, there cannot be a consensus of scientists who would ignore real evidence and promulgate fake evidence in huge numbers! It's impossible!"

Then came Global Warming.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Bkmrk.

[Boogieman]

“...Darwinists have never faced those questions,” he explained. “They’ve never asked scientifically, can random mutation and natural selection generate the information content in living things.”

---

The fact is that a lot of scientists seem to have a difficulty knowing when to just say “We don’t know.” They have put too much faith in materialism to provide answers, and when it cannot, they simply latch on to whatever seems like the least ludicrous possible solution, even if it can’t be scientifically established.

[bigbob]

So what? It’s a theory, lots of people agree and disagree with every theory. Nature of the beast.

[captain_dave]

“Theory” of Evolution? ... It’s only a barely plausible Hypothesis. Within a species there has been some observed adaptation but never has one species been observed to transform into a new species.

[Verbosus]

BookMark

[joethedrummer]

..Only 1000 people disagree with flat-earthers...

therefore, anyone who still believes it’s round is crazy!

...idiot logic

[Freedom'sWorthIt]

Nice to read. Thanks.

Evolution is a hoax based on biased “science” just like Global Warming is a hoax based on biased “science”.....

But what destruction these hoaxes have wrought.....

[Vaquero]

Stop. Global warming IS fake. Evolution is a fact. No theory. A fact. (Various permutations Of evolution may be considered theoretical)

You can still keep your faith and understand how the world works. You wouldn’t give up fire or the wheel. Just another science.

[seawolf101]

There is just one problem with the missing link...

It’s missing.

[no-to-illegals]

That which is known as being true and fact can be placed on one single sheet of paper. That which is unknown and theory fills infinite volumes in infinite libraries

[freedumb2003]

Regardless of what one thinks about the evolution theory, it is still a theory.

That statement is so stupid it invalidates the entire piece.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

"Nothing comes from nothing and nothing ever could."

[onedoug]

...they believe that God created humans within fewer than 10,000 years.

100,000 years seems more viable to me. Otherwise, I'm in.

[central_va]

I really don’t care because I know no one can explain the first living cells and how they came about. Discussing evolution is like discussing a Boeing 777 and not first learning about the Wright brothers inventions.

[central_va]

n short, they believe that God created humans within fewer than 10,000 years.

Carbon dating puts first modern humans at 300,000 years ago.

[Zionist Conspirator]

I find it ironic that we have "theistic evolutionists" on this site who will absolutely refuse to consider creationism, considering many of the same people believe in the virgin birth, the loaves and fishes, the resurrection, and that the angels carried Mary's house from Nazareth to Loreto, Italy. Just what makes the events described in Genesis one bit harder to believe than all these other things?

Too bad the article is from an anti-Israel publication, though.

[tjd1454]

Non-scientist here (but Ph.D). It defies logic that unimaginable complexity such as found in the “simplest” of organisms could spontaneously arise. This is the death knell of evolutionary theory.

[daniel1212]

Thanks. Good you are here.

[DoodleDawg]

How many thousands more consider Darwins theory on evolution to be sound science?