Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

the issue no one addresses about muslims taking over europe

Posted on 12/16/2018 3:27:56 PM PST by Secret Agent Man

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: zeestephen
As far as I know, NATO still stores nuclear weapons at Incirlik Air Base in Turkey.

Turkey is under the control of Recep Erdogan, who is an Islamic tyrant.

I thought I read that they have been moved out of Turkey. For exactly this reason. Rumor is that they went to Romania.

41 posted on 12/16/2018 10:08:04 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MCF

[ Islam recognizes nether nations or boundaries. That is why the Globalist like it. ]

I sometimes wonder if the globalists want Islam to take over, then at some point when the world is over 75% Islamic they do a “project blue beam” on the planet and have a hologram of Mohammad tell everyone to follow a new leader that the globalists pick for them...

If they cannot project a hologram over the whole world, they would only need to have one appear over mecca during the Hadji season....

Scary crap to think about...


42 posted on 12/17/2018 12:27:29 AM PST by GraceG ("If I post an AWESOME MEME, STEAL IT! JUST RE-POST IT IN TWO PLACES PLEASE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

I wonder if Mudslimes would even need the actual hardware? The day they take Europe is the day they’ll also take possession of thousands of Western physicists and engineer slaves to build their nukes for them. Yes, we could probably sabotage all the European centrifuges, manufacturing facilities, etc., before the SOBs seized it all, but what Muslims need more than hardware is brainpower, and they’ll have it in spades the day they take Europe, imo.


43 posted on 12/17/2018 1:07:46 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldasrocks

Good question.

A better one might be, “Should we sink the sub before it fires an ICBM, and then take out its shore control centers/base including GCHQ?”


44 posted on 12/17/2018 7:14:05 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Why are the libs suddenly in love with our fired AG, and want to protect him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

sinking the sub? Great now we have a few nukes sitting in the ocean. Mad dash by several countries to salvage the nukes and the conflict leads to WW3. I may watch too many movies LOL>


45 posted on 12/17/2018 7:16:53 AM PST by oldasrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: oldasrocks

Who would now if the water was deep enough?


46 posted on 12/17/2018 9:03:49 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Why are the libs suddenly in love with our fired AG, and want to protect him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson