Kavenaugh should put on some big boy pants and take EVERY, SINGLE person involved with hurting him and his family to court ... to the greatest extent of the law.
I honestly believe Brett Kavenaugh really IS a choir boy and what the democrats and Soros minions have done IS prosecutable and SHOULD be prosecuted.
It can only happen during the Trump administration.
Kavenaugh should put on some big boy pants and take EVERY, SINGLE person involved with hurting him and his family to court ... “”
The Gp Fund Me for THAT would be thru the roof.
I have a back channel with someone (freeper) who knows him. I trust a freeper. Choirboy.
...”I honestly believe Brett Kavenaugh really IS a choir boy and what the democrats and Soros minions have done IS prosecutable and SHOULD be prosecuted.”...
I really believe that prosecutions are coming. The scales of justice must come into play here. Otherwise, we live under a toothless system where anything goes.
I honestly believe Brett Kavenaugh really IS a choir boy and what the democrats and Soros minions have done IS prosecutable and SHOULD be prosecuted.
It can only happen during the Trump administration.
It is unfair in the extreme to accuse Kavanaugh in advance of wimping out. Especially in light of the task you are demanding: that he take on " EVERY, SINGLE person involved.”Understand, IMHO he should - but that includes “the MSM.” As you know perfectly well. And you know that the name of person before Kavanaugh who has been treated similarly by the MSM (read, “the Associated Press and its members individually”) is, “legion, for we are many.” George Zimmerman, the Duke lacrosse team, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, Roy Moore, indeed every Republican to the right of John McCain (and even him, strategically). Going back to Senator Joseph McCarthy, and AFAIK beyond that.
Let’s be serious - “the MSM” is the Democrat Party - without that propaganda wind at their back they wouldn’t be a significant political force in America. My explanation of that is that cheap criticism is a profitable way to run a newspaper. That, and boasting of your own objectivity. Those two things make journalism ineluctably cynical. About society - not about government. In fact, cynicism towards society is naiveté towards government. For the simple reason that every criticism of society is a rationale for the idea that “there oughta be a law.”
What does the AP have to do with it? The AP “wire” is a continuous virtual meeting of all major US journalism. Adam Smith told us in 1776 what to expect of that:
People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. - Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations (1776)Understand, all wire services have similar homogenizing effect, and all of them actually violate the Sherman AntiTrust Act of 1890. But the AP was aggressively monopolistic from its pre-Civil War inception.Note that Scalia attached significance to the odd wording of the First Amendment, “the freedom . . . of the press.” He pointed out that freedom of the press existed prior to the First Amendment, but that freedom was limited by libel laws then - and now. without the “the” in the formulation, it would mean absolute freedom. With it, there are legitimate restraints.
So yes, by all means "take EVERY, SINGLE person involved with hurting him and his family to court ... to the greatest extent of the law.” But it ain’t no picnic to do it. The "greatest extent of the law” would be both Sherman and RICO. And if you think the Democrats and “the Media” are going crazy now . . .