Posted on 09/17/2018 5:04:15 AM PDT by Nextrush
I saw his Hannity interview.
He appeared as a person who needed time to get his lies straight, by the end of the interview his answer was different than the one in the beginning.
Like Hannity was making it clear, you better deny dating minors.
They were not legally underage in Moores 20s
This notion thats girls 16-18 are rape victims if the guy is over 18 is only about one generation old
It used to be age of consent was the law
13-16 depending
Now a 19 year old boy with a 16 year old is a rapist
That said ..Moore apparently was in search of young wife material maybe..a bit odd but so far Ive seen no crime
Hes damn sure stood up for our side for you to be that derisive
I voted for him.
It used to be age of consent was the law
13-16 depending
Now a 19 year old boy with a 16 year old is a rapist
That said ..Moore apparently was in search of young wife material maybe..a bit odd but so far Ive seen no crime
Hear, hear! In Ireland in particular, the tradition was that a man didnt marry until he inherited his fathers farm - and an unmarried woman over the age of 20 was a spinster.Now, it has to be said that a substantial age difference like that just naturally tends to make the girl (as we would now call her) the junior partner in her marriage. But that was the norm. You nor I created that system, but there it is. Or was.
Treating a Roy Moore as a creep for a now-anachronistic perspective on courtship is ex post facto behavior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.