Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IG Report: FBI Agent Peter Strzok Sent Weiner Sealed Indictment To His Personal Email…
CONSERVATIVE TREEHOUSE ^ | 6/15/2018 | SUNDANCE

Posted on 06/16/2018 1:00:50 PM PDT by bitt

One of the interesting aspects of the IG report is the documented use of personal email by participants within the FBI “small group” Mid-Year-Exam (MYE) team. [pg 424]

One of those documented examples involves FBI Agent Peter Strzok downloading the content of the sealed Anthony Weiner Indictment, October 29, 2016, to his personal email address. Unauthorized extraction of a ‘sealed SDNY indictment‘, and transmission to a non-secure system, is a felony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 201610; 20161029; anthonyweiner; braking; coup; deepstate; democrats; dojigreportanalysis; dojigreportreleased; fbi; hillaryclinton; humaabedin; igreport; indictment; midyearexam; mye; nthonyweiner; peterstrzok; sdny; strzok; sundance; weiner; weinerindicted; weinerindictment; yesterday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: kevao

I claimed he knows nothing about what is proceeding in the DOJ

You chose to make a fake post

Not true, all made up


61 posted on 06/16/2018 4:18:06 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Greetings Jacques. The revolution is coming))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine

“President Trump is in control and he is no fool.”


“I don’t know how Peter Strzok is working there anymore,” Trump told Doocy.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/15/president-breaks-his-silence-on-damning-ig-report-calls-it-total-disaster-for-fired-fbi-director-james-comey.html


62 posted on 06/16/2018 4:20:36 PM PDT by corlorde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bert
I claimed he knows nothing about what is proceeding in the DOJ

Fair enough. He doesn't. Nor do I. And neither do you.

You chose to make a fake post. Not true, all made up

I didn't paraphrase you; I simply copied and pasted what you wrote.

If that's fake, then maybe you want to retract what you posted? I certainly didn't put any words in your mouth; so "fake" applies only to what you yourself wrote.

63 posted on 06/16/2018 4:28:55 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright

Personnel?

That’s for idiots.


64 posted on 06/16/2018 4:35:00 PM PDT by wally_bert (This is the message phone company. I see youÂ’re using our unit, now how about paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
I didn't see specific allegations that Strzok leaked the sealed information. There is a large section on leaks in the IG report on leaks, but it is very general. My view is Strzok has a slap on the wrist coming, and maybe more if they see the need for a fall guy. Clearly Strzok was incredibly unprofessional in his job, and it remains to be seen whether they will word it as "grossly negligent" as Hillary was and should have been charged, or water it down to "extremely careless" the way they did for Hillary.

Perhaps I am too cynical but I don't see how this report on Strzok's misconduct will result in any felony charges. One thing I do know is that Hillary is not going to be charged or "locked up".

65 posted on 06/16/2018 4:53:05 PM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: palmer; bitt
I didn't see specific allegations that Strzok leaked the sealed information.

You didn't look very hard, did you?

"During our review, we identified several instances where Strzok used his personal email account for government business. Examples included an email chain forwarded to Strzok’s personal email account on December 10, 2016, discussing a draft congressional response, and draft versions of emails on his personal email account that Strzok eventually sent to other FBI employees using his government account. Most troubling, on October 29, 2016, Strzok forwarded from his FBI account to his personal email account an email about the proposed search warrant the Midyear team was seeking on the Weiner laptop. This email included a draft of the search warrant affidavit, which contained information from the Weiner investigation that appears to have been under seal at the time in the Southern District of New York and information obtained pursuant to a grand jury subpoena issued in the Eastern District of Virginia in the Midyear investigation."
66 posted on 06/16/2018 5:17:16 PM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Who else has he done this for?


67 posted on 06/16/2018 5:18:41 PM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

a non-FBI family member had access to Strzok’s personal email account in 2017


68 posted on 06/16/2018 5:23:45 PM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

bbb


69 posted on 06/16/2018 5:28:28 PM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

In the famous words of Dirty Harry:

Personnel?

Personnel is for assholes !


70 posted on 06/16/2018 5:29:59 PM PDT by Reverend Wright (I am a Putin bot and I approve this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
If you look at my post 8, you will see I quote part of the same text that you quote. But that is not a leak. He took home some sealed information against policy. There is no claim in the report that he leaked it. In the report that he thought it was ok to take the material home to work on it.

So no leak, no felony, no jail time, at least with what we have in this milqtoast watered-down report. Strzok's conduct is suitable for a banana republic. The pertinent question is whether Congress will do anything about it. The broader question is whether the voters will do anything about Congress. But I am not optimistic.

But there is no felony listed in the report for Sessions to prosecute, and certainly nothing that Trump can do. However there should be a real investigation by someone. Another special prosecutor? That would probably be rigged.

71 posted on 06/16/2018 6:11:09 PM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: palmer
There is no claim in the report that he leaked it.

NONSENSE!

"...a non-FBI family member had access to Strzok’s personal email account in 2017..."

Stop defending the crimes of the Clintons and corruption of the SWAMP!
72 posted on 06/16/2018 6:15:16 PM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: palmer
But there is no felony listed in the report for Sessions to prosecute...

Really?

“[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Page texted Strzok in August 2016.

“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded.

18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government
73 posted on 06/16/2018 6:27:19 PM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
Stop defending the crimes of the Clintons and corruption of the SWAMP!

Simply answer my original question. Is there a felony committed by Strzok listed in the report? He says he took home material then "double deleted" it. By 2017 the email was long gone according to Strzok. Obviously he could be lying but that would require a real investigation to find that out.

If you want to defend "sundance" and his allegation of a felony, specfically: "Unauthorized extraction of a ‘sealed SDNY indictment‘, and transmission to a non-secure system, is a felony." then specify the felony.

74 posted on 06/16/2018 6:32:38 PM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Simply answer my original question. Is there a felony committed by Strzok listed in the report?

I did! and the answer was YES! Stop being STUPID!
75 posted on 06/16/2018 6:37:05 PM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
From the report: "But our review did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that these political views directly affected the specific investigative decisions that we reviewed in this chapter."

I agree that Strzok should be criminally investigated. But did he advocate the overthrow of Government? Trump was not President, so no, he did not. His actual crimes probably involve illegal search (Trump spying which he was involved with early on) and illegal destruction or suppression of evidence in the Hillary case.

76 posted on 06/16/2018 6:38:19 PM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
Don't attack me, I am simply posting facts to call out the Sundances of the world when they make stuff up. If you have a felony statute and action by Strzok to back up what Sundance claims, then post it. The specific claim is: "Unauthorized extraction of a ‘sealed SDNY indictment‘, and transmission to a non-secure system, is a felony."

If I am wrong, I will say so and apologize.

77 posted on 06/16/2018 6:41:58 PM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: palmer

http://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/357688-christie-slams-leak-of-reported-indictment-in-russia-probe-it


78 posted on 06/16/2018 6:47:42 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: bert
You actually know nothing of what is transpiring in the DOJ<<<

OHHH! can you fill us in?????...Didn't think so...lol....you just wanted to put somebodies opinion down...right?

79 posted on 06/16/2018 6:58:43 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: palmer
His actual crimes probably involve...

and now you are beginning to admit that he committed crimes. Baby steps...
80 posted on 06/16/2018 7:11:24 PM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson