Skip to comments.
'Assault Weapons,' Explained
Reason ^
| 5/14/18
| Jacob Sullum
Posted on 05/14/2018 3:06:08 PM PDT by Sopater
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
05/14/2018 3:06:09 PM PDT
by
Sopater
To: Sopater
2
posted on
05/14/2018 3:12:46 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
To: Sopater
There was a study about 25 years ago that looked at mass shootings including the “McMassacre” in this story, as to which weapons used caused the highest death rates. Not surprisingly shotguns were far above handguns and semi-auto rifles in fatality rates. The worst thing would be if these shooters switched form scary black rifles to pump shotguns.
3
posted on
05/14/2018 3:19:10 PM PDT
by
Hugin
(Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
To: Sopater
4
posted on
05/14/2018 3:20:45 PM PDT
by
PROCON
To: Sopater; mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; umgud; ...
RKBA Ping List
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
5
posted on
05/14/2018 3:22:05 PM PDT
by
PROCON
To: PROCON
That pic explains a lot of it...
Maybe if ‘we’ paint them fuchsia or pink they will be less intimidating....
6
posted on
05/14/2018 3:30:07 PM PDT
by
xrmusn
((6/98)""Liberals suffer from PTDS -PRESIDENT TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME")
To: Sopater
There is no legitimate use for these. Nobody hunts deer with them." The tired canard, used by those who have no idea what the second amendment is about.
7
posted on
05/14/2018 3:33:28 PM PDT
by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: Sopater
Assault weapons bans are just the camels nose under the tent...the goal is to totally disarm law abiding citizens. Liberals only want, the military, police and their brown shirts to have guns.
8
posted on
05/14/2018 3:34:53 PM PDT
by
The Great RJ
("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
To: MileHi
There is no legitimate use for these. Nobody hunts deer with them." The tired canard, used by those who have no idea what the second amendment is about.
Even if the 2A had anything to do with hunting (as you point out, it doesn't), the simple fact is that AR-pattern rifles are some of the most popular hunting rifles in America.
9
posted on
05/14/2018 3:37:51 PM PDT
by
Simon Green
("Arm your daughter, sir, and pay no attention to petty bureaucrats.")
To: PROCON
10
posted on
05/14/2018 3:39:17 PM PDT
by
rockrr
( Everything is different now...)
To: xrmusn
Maybe if we paint them fuchsia or pink they will be less intimidating....
Camouflage would be more practical and might even serve the same purpose.
11
posted on
05/14/2018 3:41:53 PM PDT
by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: Sopater
Camouflage would be more practical and might even serve the same purpose.
= = = = = = = = = =
Surprised you didn’t spot the sarcasm in my line.
However, we are dealing with LIBs here, paint them ‘soft’ and they won’t recognize them.
12
posted on
05/14/2018 3:45:25 PM PDT
by
xrmusn
((6/98)""Liberals suffer from PTDS -PRESIDENT TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME")
To: Sopater
“then the Second Amendment guarantees nothing.”
**********************************************
That is the case in many of the communist states, CA, MA, NJ, CT, NY, MD
13
posted on
05/14/2018 3:48:48 PM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: Sopater
I love the Ruger Mini 14 ranch rifle with a 4X9 scope on it.
Pigs have a bad day with me around.
14
posted on
05/14/2018 3:54:55 PM PDT
by
Texas resident
(Democrats=Enemy of People of The United States of America)
To: The Great RJ
Are we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in our possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?
Patrick Henry
15
posted on
05/14/2018 3:56:05 PM PDT
by
slag
(reelect nobody)
To: Sopater
16
posted on
05/14/2018 3:59:38 PM PDT
by
sauropod
(I am His and He is mine.)
To: Sopater
July 18 1984...
San Diego’s McDonald.
17
posted on
05/14/2018 4:04:37 PM PDT
by
Big Red Badger
(UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
To: Sopater
Out of one side of their mouths they will say that the AR-15 is only good for killing people and out of the other side they will say it isn’t good for self defense.
18
posted on
05/14/2018 4:08:28 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
To: xrmusn
Surprised you didnt spot the sarcasm in my line.
Oh, I did. It was more than obvious... I just thought I'd throw a little practicality back at ya. ;-)
19
posted on
05/14/2018 4:08:54 PM PDT
by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: Sopater
I left my M1A and Mini-14 stock so, they couldn’t be banned....
20
posted on
05/14/2018 4:13:55 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZGw2M)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson