President Trump is an extremely loyal guy who is more than willing to give those that help him a chance. The only problem is, that as a businessman he could call these people in and say "You're Fired" at any time when they didn't produce. In the cesspool that is DC, this is not as easy, and in the case of our DO NOTHING Attorney General, almost impossible.
“as a businessman he [Trump] could call these people in and say “You’re Fired” at any time when they didn’t produce. In the cesspool that is DC, this is not as easy, and in the case of our DO NOTHING Attorney General, almost impossible.”
I don’t mean to single you out, Sons of Liberty, but your post is a perfect opportunity to ask Sessions critics about what seems to be a recurring inconsistency in all the Sessions criticism here on FR.
And PLEASE - before everyone jumps on me with accusations that I’m a Qtard or a deep state shill, or that I must believe in super duper secret plans or 10D chess, or think that Mueller or Rosenstien are secretly working for Trump - for the record, I believe NONE of those things and I think the Q stuff is pure Quackery, as I’ve said many times.
My question is this:
Isn’t there a glaring inconsistency between...
1) the meme that Jeff Sessions, if not for his recusals and refusals to act - if not for all his myriad of failings, ranging from being compromised, to being deep state, to being comatose, to being senile - if not for that, he could EASILY have nipped the Russia nonsense in the bud, indicted hundreds of Clinton/Obama minions, fired RR and many other deep state holdovers - and the Mueller witch hunt would never have happened. In short, if not for Sessions, the swamp would be all but drained, the Clintons and Podestas would be in jail along with Jarret, Rice, Holder, etc., - Trump’s presidency would be going swimmingly.
...and 2) ...the meme that Trump has his hands tied due the cesspool of DC politics - the deep state won’t let him fire anyone or he’ll be impeached. He has to bend over and take whatever the deep state dishes out.
This is a sincere question - please don’t everyone pile on with the usual snarky stuff - I just want to know how the DC swamp can have a tough guy like Donald Trump completely beat, but yet a better AG would have drained the swamp months ago and put the Clintons in jail.
If you can accept that Trump is powerless against the deep state - and can’t fire anyone without getting impeached - if DC is that formidable - then how can you think an AG - any AG - could/should have dealt with all of these problems long ago? If a kick ass POTUS like Trump can’t do it, how is a mere AG supposed to have done it?
Thanks for listening....
[Getting by ready to duck]