Posted on 03/10/2018 7:54:45 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Current Special Counsel rules were created by the very same cabal of DOJ careerists currently exploiting them to cover-up their 9/11 treason
Download, study and share the "Crimeline" widely
(Excerpt) Read more at americans4innovation.blogspot.com ...
Swell. Unfortunately the rest of the court system doesn’t seem to agree with you
If a law negates the Constitution which is supreme?
The law or the Constitution?
Time to ask the Supreme Court!
The article claimed the Special Counsel is not a law. I posted the law. So, the article is in error. That’s the point.
The EPA did that also....
See #10.
.
Until you can get a judge to throw out an indictment on those grounds, it just doesn’t matter.
.
.
The special counsel authorization statute is long expired.
.
It's funny how the Constitution is a very small document and the bastardization and abuse in "law" books could fill a gymnasium.
We do not have a problem with our constitution. We have a problem with Jurists that ignore the constitution and create new constitutional law out of thin air based on their judicial activism.
It should be noted that The Constitution was written by men of great education and knowledge but The Constitution was written in the vernacular of the common man. It really means what it says and is not hard to interpret.
You’re confusing the Office of Special Counsel headed by Henry Kerner that protects government employees with Special Counsel Mueller. They are completely unrelated.
The US Constitution is among the most clear, concise, best written legal documents in the history of earth.
It takes an addled mind to pervert its clear directions, or sheer ill intent.
It boggles the mind that a modern law regarding toothpaste or digital watches will run to hundreds of pages when the entire US Constitution has merely 34 pages including all the amendments.
“Unfortunately the rest of the court system doesn’t seem to agree with you.”
I do not think the RENO DOJ procedure has ever met a Constitutional challenge in court - yet. If I am right, that no one has challenged the procedure in court, it would be wrong to say “the court system” agrees with it.
It is a regulation, not a “law”, and simple Congressional over-ride can negate it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.