[Yo-Yo]

At least a tax would be constitutional. A tax was the same approach taken by the 1934 National Firearms Act that regulated machine guns, short barreled rifles and shotguns, silencers, and destructive devices.

An outright ban on semi-automatic guns would be unconstitutional.

[i_robot73]

>
An outright ban on semi-automatic guns would be unconstitutional.
>

And WHOM determines the taxation rate that crossed the Rubicon of ‘infringement’?? The courts, case after case after where the legislature(s)\Fedzilla play ‘keep away’ by tweaking the rate/law every 6mo.??

Was not the $200 ‘stamp’, at the time, wholly out of the realm of most Citizens? A defacto BAN?