Posted on 01/26/2018 9:46:37 AM PST by davikkm
There are some interesting facts coming out in court right now in the Las Vegas shooting case. For instance, this is a very interesting statement made by officer Laura Meltzer, a Metro spokeswoman. She said, The department is investigating possible criminal charges related to items discovered during the service of search warrants.
However, she did not say where the searches were, nor she could not specify the type of charges or what was found without compromising the investigation.
The police would not need search warrants for Paddocks room, nor for the items left behind by concert goers. Or I would not think they would; however, I could be wrong. I know a US Judge unsealed more than 300 pages of FBI warrant records justifying searches of Paddocks properties in Reno and Mesquite, Nevada, along with vehicles and multiple email, Facebook, and other internet accounts belonging to Paddock and to Marilou Danley.
(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...
“possible criminal charges”
—
Against whom?
How about "Antifa" !
I’m waiting for someone to appoint a ‘Commission”
In honor of past Gov’t BS, I suggest we use the bane
“Warren Commission”
I mean, couldb’t be any worse, right?
My guess is they are going to attack the suppliers of some of these firearms?
My supposition would be these are related to search warrants served offsite perhaps at his home or the home of associates or family. The criminal charges may be related to the child porn found on his computer. An investigation like this probably turns over quite a few rocks.
I doubt though that the DA plans to pursue the firearm suppliers unless they are trying to use what happened as a means to initiate RICO against them. A tactic which has been suggested by gun control zealots in the past.
The Sherrif’s claim was that they had to explosively breach the door connnecting the two rooms:
If Paddock was a lone shooter, HOW had he been moving between the two rooms..? (first concert shooting, then airport shooting from the other room from a different angle)
It had been locked from the OTHER side.
Great link, and stunning if true.
It locks when you shut it and can only be opened from the one side?
That’s how they typically work.
You generally have to prop them open to keep them open to walk back and forth.
If one of them shuts, it can only be opened from one side.
http://idighardware.com/2015/12/decoded-communicating-doors-between-sleeping-rooms/
You can only open the door from one side.
Paddock just needed to prop them open to go back and forth.
He could then shut them to prevent access.
How did he shut one after he DIED..?
The cops said they had to open it explosively.
He shut it when he crossed over the last time.
Simple.
He then shot himself.
Now the other room is only accessible via the normal hallway door or by breaching the connecting door.
He’s in 134 and he breaks out the window to fire some shots at the fuel tanks and maybe some at the crowd,
He closes the connecting door to secure the room and goes out via the hallway door to room 135.
After he is in 135 he sees and shoots at the security guard.
He breaks out that window and begins his crowd massacre at some point either just before, or just after he shoots at the guard in the hallway.
At some point he decides the cops are closing in, and he offs himself. Long before he actually needed to.
It does present some timing problems.
Overall though, it’s not difficult to lock the connecting door and then go around to get in the other room.
Paddock must have started his shooting in room 134, and then he must have gone down the hallway to get back into 135.
So he must have gone down the hallway after the shooting started.
Maybe, if they were illegally sold, but I dunno if that’s what they’re looking at here.
I found a good picture of the blown door to his room.
Only saw 27 bullet holes, not 200 as claimed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.