One of Rush’s subs was talking about a guy who hacked avionics onboard, in-flight through the *entertainment/electronic* interface. Sat in a wing seat and moved the flaps. FBI wouldn’t believe him.
Richard Clarke acknowledged that the US government probably has the technology to hack a vehicle and cause a crash. See https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/michael-hastings-car-hacked_n_3492339.html
A guy who made an App to demonstrate that a plane can be hacked: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2307494/Want-control-plane-youre-flying—Dont-worry-theres-app—Hacker-demonstrates-hijack-onboard-computers.html
He says terrorists wouldn’t have the know-how to do such a thing because they’d have to have such good knowledge of the plane’s system.
But when you consider the criminal acts of both the FAA and NTSB in the Fuddy hoax - and when you realize that James Clapper and John Brennan (intel heads who had the ability to operate in secret on supposed “national security” grounds) used their powers and position to contract Dennis Montgomery to undetectably hack the FL voter database and the Vital Records database at the Hawaii Department of Health shortly before Obama’s long-form was supposedly released - you realize that as long as our government remains unchecked they have limitless expertise and resources in their hands, and have already demonstrated the lawlessness and malicious intent to do ANYTHING THEY WANT TO DO.
Here, again, are Clarke’s words, according to the cited article: Clarke said, There is reason to believe that intelligence agencies for major powers including the United States know how to remotely seize control of a car.
Think about that. Why would our intelligence agencies develop the ability to remotely seize control of a car?
Why would they develop the ability to leave Russian “fingerprints” on cyber attacks?
People NEED to realize we are in a big, big mess. We’ve got a Frankenstein that has been developing, on our dime, the ability to do to us whatever they want. Nobody is safe at this point.