Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Trump Is Getting Ready To Go After Human Traffickers And Those Involved In Uranium One
IWB ^ | Ruby Henley

Posted on 12/23/2017 6:41:09 AM PST by davikkm

This was posted on – https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

The date of the executive order by President Trump was yesterday. When you read over this, you are going to ask yourself, “who,” “what,” “when,” and “where.” It is huge news, and I believe Trump may be going after pedophiles. When you think about “human rights abuse”…what could be worse than taking a small child and destroying innocence with sexual perversion?

Then when you read the following, what do you think about?

“I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;

(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: traffickers; trump; uraniumone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 12/23/2017 6:41:09 AM PST by davikkm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Best. President. Ever!


2 posted on 12/23/2017 6:42:19 AM PST by GoldenState_Rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Clinton Foundation.
Jeffery Epstein.


3 posted on 12/23/2017 6:46:56 AM PST by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

“Clinton Foundation.
Jeffery Epstein.”

... EVERYONE.

The more you look into it, the number of those involved outnumbers those who aren’t.

And everyday I’m brough right back to pizzagate, and more evidence that shows the emails talking about pizza were coded words for kids.

I’m convinced. I don’t want to be convinced, but this has me convinced. I’m not even convinced of ghosts, aliens, or angels but of this I am convinced.


4 posted on 12/23/2017 6:49:15 AM PST by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Democrats have good reason to shudder.


5 posted on 12/23/2017 6:51:24 AM PST by The_Republic_Of_Maine (RINO politicians beware your time is coming ... SOON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Hopefully he’s going to use US Marshalls and the Marines, because I wouldn’t trust anyone at the DOJ on this, they already burtied it all once.


6 posted on 12/23/2017 6:51:32 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Trump: "What the FBI has done is really, really disgraceful, and a lot of people are very angry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm
And that important key word sprinked throughout:

Corruption.

7 posted on 12/23/2017 6:56:39 AM PST by spokeshave (FBI = Feral Bureau of Insurrection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Clinton: to “deep state”...quick! wake up Sessions and have him “look into this”, we need him to stall for about 3 years to finish shredding the evidence.


8 posted on 12/23/2017 6:57:15 AM PST by davidb56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Celerity

To Celerity...seems you took the red pill...good choice.


9 posted on 12/23/2017 6:58:57 AM PST by davidb56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Celerity

If you’re right (and I suspect you are), then what better rationale for conspiring together to maintain a cover-up? We know that has happened, every day brings a new revelation from one deep state operative or another - but we don’t hear much about the “why”. Are they covering up something even deeper and darker than most people would even dream of?

Putting this order in place may portend where the answers lie. Trump would not be issuing an EO of this nature if there wasn’t a reason.


10 posted on 12/23/2017 7:02:58 AM PST by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Well, good.

The porous southern border feeds the human trafficking system (aka slave trade). And while Democrats have pushed for opening the border more and more, the government has been putting up signs in highway rest areas to give people information on how to recognize and report human trafficking. As if providing an 800 number is any substitute for actually taking proactive action to stop it.

Finally, we have a president who prefers action over meaningless gestures.


11 posted on 12/23/2017 7:03:47 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidb56

“To Celerity...seems you took the red pill...good choice.”

My first question is the simple one: A conspiracy so large, how are a couple hundred people keeping this secret ?

Congressmen, and particularly leftist ones, are the dumbest people I’ve ever met. They would NEVER be able to pull off such a secret because they can’t tune a radio.

But there it is. This sort of evil needs management.


12 posted on 12/23/2017 7:06:18 AM PST by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Celerity

because the MSM is silent. And the whistle blowers are ignored. There are plenty of examples of this. Seth Rich comes to mind, with Debbie w Shultz.


13 posted on 12/23/2017 7:08:32 AM PST by davidb56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Great week for Trump.


14 posted on 12/23/2017 7:11:26 AM PST by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Going after pedophiles?
Democrats outraged!!!


15 posted on 12/23/2017 7:14:50 AM PST by dsrtsage (For Leftists, World History starts every day at breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
“As if providing an 800 number is any substitute for actually taking proactive action to stop it.”

Or a hashtag by Michelle 0.

16 posted on 12/23/2017 7:16:35 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
THE NYT REPORTED: Money poured into The Clinton Foundation from a constellation of people with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakh mines. Without those assets, the Russians would have had no interest in the deal: “It wasn’t the goal to buy the Wyoming mines. The goal was to acquire the Kazakh assets, which are very good,” Mr. Novikov, the Rosatom spokesman, said in an interview.

BILLYBOOBOO TO THE RESCUE---This gambit by Bill Clinton (meddling in a foreign election) got the Russian uranium scheme going. Bill's calculated handshake was a bonanza for the Kazahk president's re-election. Nazarbayev responded in kind and signed-off on the initial phase of Russia's takeover of US uranium assets.

Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev greets former
president Clinton (L) in Almaty on September 6, 2005.

CIRCA 2015 A Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times reporter claims that former President Bill Clinton falsely denied hosting a meeting with Kazakh officials when she tried to write a story that involved his foundation several years ago.

Jo Becker, who works on the newspaper's investigative desk, said Clinton only confirmed the meeting took place after she informed him there were photographs.

Clinton's role in a deal that involved Kazakhstan, the Russian government, and a man who donated millions to the president's charitable foundation were detailed in a story Becker published on Thursday.

That article revisited some of her earlier reporting and included information from the upcoming book "Clinton Cash," which is generating widespread headlines amid a flurry of reports suggesting it will raise serious questions about Clinton's family foundation.

The donor in question is Canadian mining executive Frank Giustra, a longtime friend of the former president who has given tens of millions to the Clinton Foundation in the past few years. (A couple of hours after the NYT story was published, Giustra issued a defiant statement. We've included that below.)

Becker initially wrote about the February 2007 meeting between Clinton, Giustra, and executives from the state-owned nuclear company Kazatomprom in 2008. The gathering took place at Clinton's home in Chappaqua, New York.

"When I first contacted both the Clinton foundation — Mr. Clinton's spokesman — and Mr. Giustra, they denied any such meeting ever took place," Becker recalled in footage aired by Fox News on Thursday.

However, Becker said Clinton and Giustra both changed their stories after she confronted them with evidence to the contrary.

"And then when we told them, 'Well we already talked to the head of Kazatomprom, who not only told us all about the meeting, but actually has a picture of him and Bill at the home in Chappaqua, and that he proudly displayed on his office wall.' They then acknowledged that yes, the meeting had taken place," Becker continued in the television interview.

The purpose of the meeting, then Kazatomprom President Moukhtar Dzhakishev told The Times, was to discuss Kazakhstan potentially buying a 10% stake in Westinghouse, a US nuclear company. Becker's 2008 story also noted one of Giustra's companies secured a deal to buy uranium deposits from Kazatomprom in 2005.

That agreement was made after Clinton accompanied Giustra on a trip to Kazakhstan. During the trip, Giustra and Clinton met with Kazakhstan's President Nursultan Nazarbayev.

Clinton issued a public statement praising the Kazakh leader despite his questionable, antidemocratic record. The Times called the praise a "propaganda coup" for Nazarbayev. (he later "won relection" w/ an unbelievable 90% of the vote)

"Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton's charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle," wrote Becker and another reporter, Don Van Natta.

A spokesperson for the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership told Business Insider they are "working on a formal statement" in response to a request for comment on Thursday. Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership is an initiative of the Clinton Foundation that was cofounded by Clinton and Giustra in 2007. A Clinton Foundation spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

http://www.businessinsider.com/nyt-reporter-clinton-lied-about-meeting-2015-48/25

17 posted on 12/23/2017 7:17:32 AM PST by Liz (One side in this conflict has 8 Trillion bullets; the other side doesnt know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All
Thoughtful Americans are asking: we know the Clintons got a $145 million bribe payable to the Clinton Foundation, but how much did Russia actually pay the US for the uranium?

Anybody ever see a figure on that?

What happened to the cash for the actual uranium sale? Did that money go into OFA--Obama’s slush fund for revolution? Or maybe into some offshore accounts?......

Particularly interesting is that immediately after exiting the white House, the Obama's traveled far and wide in such a short time -- their itinerary included Indonesia, Bali, French Polynesia; all those out-of-the-way places w/ infamous offshore banks that have numbered accounts.

THIS WE KNOW: the conniving Clintons took uranium.....a national strategic US asset......and sold it for their personal gain.

That smells like the infamous Teapot Dome scandal. Law professor Jonathan Turley said the Clintons uranium scheme .... "could be criminal." Turley (or somebody) needs to address the Clinton criminality in this context.

=======================================

More egregiously (to me) is that the criminal Clintons used proprietary information----intel the govt uses to secure the safety and security of we, the people.....to carry out their criminal acts.

I consider it reprehensible that Secy Hillary routinely sent her itinerary to the Clinton Foundation, giving the Clintons govt info to plot their scams.

18 posted on 12/23/2017 7:18:05 AM PST by Liz (One side in this conflict has 8 Trillion bullets; the other side doesnt know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: davikkm
What does it mean to have all your property and assets "blocked"? Is that the same as "seized" or "taken"?

Okay, I admit I didn't read every word of the article, I just quickly skimmed it, but nowhere did I find the words "tried" or "convicted" of any crime. What, a trial is not necessary, if it has been "determined" by Treasury, the AG, and SoS that you're dirty?

Secretary of Treasury, Secretary of State, and Attorney General are all appointed positions, picked by POTUS. During the previous administration, that was Jack Lew, Eric Holder, and Hillary Clinton, appointed by Barack Obama.

Yeah, this doesn't work for me at all. Having everything you own seized by people you didn't elect, without due process? NO!

19 posted on 12/23/2017 7:19:19 AM PST by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Think about the Panama Papers ... and start connecting names to the Clintons


20 posted on 12/23/2017 7:21:39 AM PST by silverleaf (A man who kneels for the national anthem doesn't stand for much of anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson