Well, hey—If I don’t exist then I don’t need to worry about paying taxes from now on.
Oh good. That means that no one can be racist, since only white can be racist. It also means everyone gets to be a member of a protected minority. Reeeeeee!
It’s OK to be White.
If white people don’t exist then neither will you since you depend on whites for your livelihood.
Great! Now that I don’t exist you can’t accuse me of racism.
I'm used to being talked down to by libscum, but I will not have Marley used against me.
That was mighty white of Blaney to write that.
Time to play my non-existent privilege card.
Why excerpt?
Anyhow, the author is also saying blacks or any other group don’t exist.
I await his Dear Black People, you do not exist essay.
I'd say the last 60 years or so since LBJ started the "Great Society." Since then it is non stop black, black, black, black, black, black, black, black, black, black. Now toss in a lot of brown, brown, brown, brown, too.
How can 12% of the population so control and dominate the language?
Prior to LBJ, most people never thought in terms of black and white.
But what about all the people accused of “acting White”? Like all those straight A Asian students who come from stable families. Isn’t their whole lifestyle a co-opting of racist ideology? Don’t their top drawer math skills demean “authentic” people of color?
The best thing about being white is not having to think about my race or skin color on a daily basis. It is a blessing not to care about what color I am. The other races, in what seems like a perpetual state of envy, will never know the liberating feeling not caring can be.
OK, instead of “white”, say “Native European”, this being defined as being descended from the indigenous people of Europe.
Great i dont have to work, or pay taxes ,or pay for anything anymore. I dont have to follow laws anymore. I dont exist. Awesome.
If you examine the DNA differences between a tall Swedish male and a short Pygmy woman from the Congo, there is only a .03% difference. They would share 99.7% of the same genetic profile.
This may seem like nit-picking but actually, 99.7% shared DNA leaves 0.3% difference, not .03% as in the article.
What's the point? That if you can't do something as simple as arithmetic, why should I trust you with something as complex as genetics.
When you set out to contradict what is self-evident and obvious, you've got to bring to the table a better game than sloppy reasoning skills and political fanaticism. You might find more success if you started by pointing out the folly of the racial pandering of the left.
OK. So why don’t get off my arse?