No 30-something woman likes being reminded that the men she hopes will marry her, would pass her over for a younger woman if they could. That was part of Moore’s problem. Trump had that problem with Republican women, but he overcame it.
Women clearly need to stop thinking with their vaginas.
“No 30-something woman likes being reminded that the men she hopes will marry her, would pass her over for a younger woman if they could. “
As I’ve mentioned before. In the 1970’s, in Alabama. The ONLY women in their 30’s who were unmarried were either divorced, lesbians or ‘career women’. And very few of the latter.
Any women over 22 in fact fit in those categories.
Any man wanting a woman without a ‘past’ sought those under 20. And not college women either.
I don’t remember Prince Charles, in the same time frame, being excoriated for wanting a young virginal wife with no past. That was a ‘fairytale’. He was a 30 something ‘dating’ a teen. Many teens in fact. Diana wasn’t the first ‘marriageable’ teen he ‘dated’.
As a woman, i’m not impressed with women who deny biology. 30+ is long in the tooth. Biology is biology and feelings won’t change it. Men are drawn to younger women because those are the fertile ones. 30 something women who expect to have the attention of a 19/20yr old are delusional for the most part. It’s only since the advent of feminism have women delayed marriage until they’re at the very edge of successful childbearing. Don’t blame the men, blame the feminists who encourage women to wait till they’re 30 something to seek a long term mate.