Skip to comments.
Could the “Machete” Lightweight Attack plane replace the A-10 Warthog?
Am Shooting Journal ^
| 11/21/2017
| J Hines
Posted on 11/21/2017 5:34:40 AM PST by w1n1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: Haiku Guy
If you get the Warthog mod, do you need to have a pilot's license? Or is your concealed carry permit enough?
And do you get the Corgi license through the ATF or the local dog pound?
21
posted on
11/21/2017 6:26:40 AM PST
by
IronJack
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
A two seat version of the new CAS plane could have the back seater controlling the drones. Build a drone around the gun and have the control plane flying at standoff range working with a forward observer designating targets.
To: BillyCuccio
A Gatling gun AR? Have you seriously considered the cumulative recoil?
A person’s shoulder has WAY less mass than an A-10 airframe.
23
posted on
11/21/2017 6:32:33 AM PST
by
alloysteel
(The rhetorical question, "How stupid can you be?" is just considered to be a challenge by some.)
To: onona
24
posted on
11/21/2017 6:32:52 AM PST
by
Big Red Badger
(UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
To: Big Red Badger
25
posted on
11/21/2017 6:44:20 AM PST
by
onona
To: Big Red Badger
26
posted on
11/21/2017 6:45:13 AM PST
by
onona
To: Vaquero
Ya know, I HAVE that chainsaw bayonet mod.
I really do.
Since my AR 15 is just for home defense the chainsaw I use is an 120 V. Makita.
I keep it plugged in at all times and have a 100’ cord.
27
posted on
11/21/2017 6:46:04 AM PST
by
BBB333
(The Power Of Trump Compels You!)
To: blackdog
What does the A10 now log in maintenance time for every hour flown? No idea. 10:1? 15:1?
28
posted on
11/21/2017 6:54:50 AM PST
by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Perhaps the most important would be to turn the aircraft into a command and control center for a wing of drones flying with the aircraft. What I would like to see would be a two-seater manned aircraft controlling drones, with the manned aircraft staying out of range of anti-aircraft missiles. The back-seater would be the drone controller. He would wear a virtual reality helmet and have a high-speed link to the drones. He would be able to "see" everything at wide-field 4K resolution, enough that he would effectively "be" there. The drones, in turn, would be mass-produced and expendable.
29
posted on
11/21/2017 6:57:04 AM PST
by
PapaBear3625
(Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
To: grobdriver
The A-10 is the lowest operating cost aircraft the military operates. $10,500 per flight hour. The only thing in the air that costs less per hour is a predator drone.
30
posted on
11/21/2017 7:03:21 AM PST
by
blackdog
To: Arm_Bears
31
posted on
11/21/2017 7:05:32 AM PST
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
To: grobdriver
“Why are they re-inventing the wheel, again?”
Keep the A-10 for ten more years and fund a tax cut.
32
posted on
11/21/2017 7:08:10 AM PST
by
alternatives?
(Why have an army if there are no borders?)
To: alloysteel
Also remember there is no ground to be absorbing the shock and vibration when firing the guns. I once had a piston tear off the top half of a cylinder. I would have thought i was flying a jackhammer. Once on the ground it was just a miss with a lot of oil and smoke. The mechanic explained how bad put of balance and shock and vibration can be in the air vs on grounf.
33
posted on
11/21/2017 7:10:04 AM PST
by
blackdog
To: w1n1
Have they build one for testing ?
To: w1n1
.... when .223 won't finish the job...
To: w1n1
Sigh. Why mess with perfection?
36
posted on
11/21/2017 7:52:58 AM PST
by
MattinNJ
(I am optimistic about the USA for the first time in a decade)
To: w1n1
Question
A10 is a heavy bird
How well does one of the current jet engines push it in emergency ?
Rear turbo fans are without question more efficient
More combat zone airtime killing Haji
37
posted on
11/21/2017 7:56:17 AM PST
by
wardaddy
(As a southerner I've never trusted the Grand Old Party.....any questions?)
To: w1n1
Better than asking "could it replace", we should be asking "should it replace".
How many of these "new and improved" super hi-tech weapon systems, vehicles and aircraft have we seen actually perform worse than the things they replace?
38
posted on
11/21/2017 8:05:45 AM PST
by
caligatrux
(Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
To: BBB333
Perhaps a drill would also help?
39
posted on
11/21/2017 8:06:27 AM PST
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: w1n1
I’m happy to read that the GAU-8 is to be integral in this version. The lighter weight of the plane with the equal protection means more weapons capability.
40
posted on
11/21/2017 10:36:44 AM PST
by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson