Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sean_Anthony

Here’s a scenario some people need to think about:

A female employee walks into the office in a mini-skirt, high heels, and a tight shirt. The older happily married boss looks at her for what seems like an inappropriate amount of time - certainly checking out her legs and cleavage. Is the boss thinking

A) How can I get her into bed?
—or—
B) Did she cross the line this time?
She always ignores the dress code but is this time too far?
Are any clients coming to the office today?
Will that client mind?
Could she accuse the client of sexual harassment if they complain (or stare)?
Can her team arrange a meeting so the clients won’t see her?
I hope she’s wearing panties? What I see now is already too much distraction - single males will try for a better view and most females will gossip. Both have caused me an HR problem before.
I’m glad I don’t have daughters.
Can I get HR to talk to her before a certain client visits next?
If I go to HR Will she accuse me of not being able to control my impulses and say it’s my problem, not hers (I often stare are her when she dresses like that and that’s harassment)?
How can I hire better in the future and still avoid EEOC complaints?

Which option is more likely to have just happened? Did you assume the boss is a man? Does it matter? Is option B believable if the boss is a woman? If so, why not a male boss?
Option (A) just needs a quick glance. Option (B) may take an “inappropriate” amount of time - there are A LOT of concerns going through the boss’s mind.


9 posted on 11/20/2017 10:31:03 AM PST by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LostPassword

“A LOT of concerns going through the boss’s mind.”

Especially the happily married part.


12 posted on 11/20/2017 10:52:52 AM PST by Bonemaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: LostPassword

I’ve chosen option B a number of times. One female employee tended to dress a bit provocatively with the intent of causing trouble. She also held the record for filing complaints. The big corporate HR department always took her side, firing some for merely saying “good morning “.


13 posted on 11/20/2017 10:54:42 AM PST by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: LostPassword

The cosmetics business is certainly booming for women (and gays) more than it ever has. Right there tells you women are all about attracting someone. Their heels are getting higher and skinnier every new season and for what purpose? It’s certainly not for the wearer’s comfort. Same with underwire bras and thong underwear. Women’s clothing has gone from mulitiple layers of floor length petticoats to less than a yard of fabric. Skirts are short and necklines are low. And those catcalls that are deemed revolting? Puleeze! Women dress to impress... the men. The more attention they get, the better. But let a fudgly man cross wherever the line is that day, they’ll scream harassment.

BTW, I’m a woman.


14 posted on 11/20/2017 11:00:56 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: LostPassword

I actually had that scenario happen with a very tall and attractive high school senior intern. She showed up for work in a tube top, open midriff, and tight pants. I called my senior Admin Assistant, who was an older lwoman, into my office and asked her to tell this young gal that she was not dressed appropriately for work.

The message coming from her gave the young woman the impression that her grandmother was giving her advice. She never dressed like that again.


15 posted on 11/20/2017 11:09:18 AM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson