[MileHi]

"preclude the evidence of water rights, fencing laws, open range laws and any other topic that would constitute a collateral attack on the merits of the 1998 and 2013 Court Orders and that could lead to jury nullification."

Can't have the defendants putting on a defense. Why, they could found not guilty.

[Delta 21]

As soon as the prosecuting attorney wants to purposefully exclude evidence that he knows could lead to jury nullification, a mis-trial should be called.

The defense gets to put forth evidence as well.