And too many will believe him.
Lie, lie, lie..
Divide, divide, divide..
It's what they do.
1. Christian
2. White
3. Male
You’re out!
ISIS is more credible than the FBI.
“-And so, some on the far right have convinced themselves that Paddock could not be what he seems”
—
And Michael Brown was a young saint.
.
There is no such thing, but nice try.
I've already seen this stuff going on in the social media.
He was an active registered Democrat in Florida. He started his gun buying spree during the election in 2016.
“And if some international organization were directing Paddock, Trump would have surely known as much from the President’s Daily Briefing, which would have given him a clear overview of terrorist activity around the world.”
**
OK, I think I can see the bile dripping from the anti-Trump author’s mouth.
Well that is a big difference. Heck some are white by birth, but believe they are black. Does the same analogy apply and should they be viewed as black, even by blacks who are denying that they are black? What a stupid statement this person penned. No wonder the press become more irrelevant with each passing day.
This guy was a white male. Perhaps we’ll see if he claimed any religion. The Scalise shooter was also a white male. I don’t know whether he claimed any religion. That makes two out of the last how many thousand?
Unless there is a pattern in these shootings, I don’t have much interest in the demographics. If there is a pattern, and I’m thinking of the obvious one, that’s different. Otherwise, religion is no more relevant than what a criminal had for breakfast.
Unsurprising from NewsWeakly, but there is zero indication Paddock was Christian. In fact, I’ve heard him described as atheist.
But as usual, they lie.
Oh yes, the fellow with “aryan” in his surname, who used to work for the NY Daily Snooze.
He had to apologize early last year for making false Nazi comparisons. Now the dog returns to his vomit.
No one is “Christian by birth” even if one’s parent or parents were followers of Jesus.
If his parent or parents proclaimed Jesus Christ as their Savior and Redeemer, they did that by their personal choice, with the prompting of the Holy Spirit.
Becoming followers of Christ is not genetic nor carried in one’s DNA but by personal decisions to turn one’s life around and proclaim salvation by one way, the only way, through the blood shed on the Cross by God’s substitutionary lamb sacrificed for His creation.
This is a startling revelation from these shytheads. I've long known that this is what the left feeeeeeeeeels but I haven't seen them so openly admit it before.
So what does it mean? It means that this can be applied every bit as much to Øbongo as it is the LV shooter. Øbongo was born and raised a muzzie. Whatever he purports to being now, islam says if you were born muzzie you stay muzzie (even in a disgraced apostate state).
I would ask this doofus for proof that the shooter was Christian. Being born white does not make a person a Christian. But then the writer of this nonsense is too stupid to live.
I have not seen any evidence AT ALL the this fiend was a Christian. None. This b.s. is 100% narrative.
Although don’t overlook the fact that if he were indicted for being a Christian and prosecuted in court, the prosecutor would have no evidence.
Who said he was a practicing Christian?
There is no such thing. Being born into a Christian family doesn't make you a Christian just like being born into a military family doesn't make you a soldier.
A Christian is someone who has placed their faith in Jesus Christ and who is sealed by the Holy Spirit. It's not a label or piece of jewelry you can purchase and wear. And there is ZERO chance ANY Christian, with the presence of the Holy Spirit of God, would ever do this.
Funny how that's applicable here but not when it comes to gender.