Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Extremist v. Extremist, Intolerance
Black and Center Blog ^ | 08/15/2017 | L. M. Walker

Posted on 08/20/2017 6:53:06 AM PDT by NaturalBornConservative

charlottesville81217

If you’ve ever been out in the streets protesting anything, you’re an extremist. If you’ve ever assembled peaceably to petition anyone, other than the government for redress of grievances, you’re an extremist. If you can’t handle the First Amendment rights of peaceable assembly and freedom of speech, you don't deserve to be called an American.

According to the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law …abridging the freedom of speech, …or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Freedom of speech may be defined as, “the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint.” The right to peaceably assemble, and to petition government for redress of grievances may be defined as, “the individual right or ability of people to come together and collectively express, promote, pursue, and defend their ideas; and make a complaint to, or seek the assistance of, one's government, without fear of punishment or reprisals.”

Congress has, thus far, made no laws abridging the freedom of speech, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Yet others, including some local governments, federal government employees, extremist groups, the Democratic Party, Google / YouTube, and Facebook, often enforce their own un-American statutes.

For example, Google recently suspended my Google Plus account indefinitely, without any right of appeal, simply for declaring myself to be a Trump supporter and posting pro-Trump news articles. Of course, prior to doing so my Collection, entitled, “Trump 2016 / 2020” had over 10,000 followers and more than 10,000,000 views. My attempts to reinstate the account fell on deaf ears.

Since I did not violate any of Google’s rules, it claimed that I violated its impersonation policy, even though, unlike others, I used my real name and biographical profile. Thus, I am no longer a part of Google’s social networking experiment. I no longer have the freedom to express myself, nor the right to peaceably associate with friends and followers, at least not using Google’s services. Nine years of associations, thousands of followers, hundreds of posts and comments, gone in a flash. So, what’s next?

If the KKK, Neo-Nazi’s, white nationalists, Alt-left, Black Lives Matter, Blue Lives Matter or any other group wants to assemble peaceably to petition the government, they have a right to do so without fear of punishment or reprisals. Certainly, such groups have the right to assemble, and the freedom to write or say whatever they wish. But, that’s not the problem in this era. The plight of our day lies in counter-protests.

Counter-protesters serve no useful purpose other than to deny others of their basic Constitutional guarantees. Government condemnation of domestic hate groups serves no meaningful purpose, as they have a right to exist. The role of the federal government should be to condemn intolerance. There is no place for intolerance, at any level, in our society.

Counter-protesters are not petitioning the government for anything. They are rather protesting against other people’s rights to speak freely, to assemble and to petition the government. Shutting down the right of free speech, or the right to associate and petition the government is not the American way.

What the federal government should do is shut down counter-protest movements in every shape, form and fashion. Congress must pass additional laws protecting basic first amendment rights, by cracking down on counter-protesters. It must also outlaw the practice of street protests. Allowing opposing groups to protest at the same time, in public venues, is asinine.

Allowing any group to protest in the streets, or public places, violates the rights of others. Allowing groups with opposing views to counter-protest encourages violence. Rather than cultivate intolerance and violence, the federal government should do everything within its power to discourage it, while at the same time protecting everyone’s First Amendment rights. The role of the federal government, and all who have taken oath to uphold the Constitution, is not to pick sides, but rather to promote tolerance in a diversity of ideas.

Google’s actions against me are reprehensible. But, the freedom I have was not granted by Google, and Google cannot take it away. Rather than fight, I have chosen to take my business elsewhere. If you don’t like MSNBC or CNN, don’t watch. If you don’t like Donald Trump, don’t go to a Trump rally, stay at home. Better yet, pow-wow with the candidate of your choice and prepare for the 2020 election. If you don’t agree with the KKK, Neo-Nazi’s, white nationalists, the Alt-left, Black Lives Matter, Blue Lives Matter, the Democratic Party, or any other group, don’t support them or attend their functions. Instead support and associate with groups you agree with. Actions such as these are not extreme in nature, but are simply the American way.


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: extremist; freespeech; intolerance; protests

1 posted on 08/20/2017 6:53:06 AM PDT by NaturalBornConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NaturalBornConservative
“Black people who were never slaves

are fighting white people who were never Nazis

over a Confederate statue erected by democrats,

because democrats can’t stand their own history any more

and somehow it’s Trump’s fault?

Interesting.”

Posted by freeper dainbramage...

2 posted on 08/20/2017 8:28:28 AM PDT by GOPJ (Start by tearing down statues ...burning books, and eventually you go after people - John Davidson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NaturalBornConservative

You finally realized that Google is evil. Welcome to the club.


3 posted on 08/20/2017 9:19:50 AM PDT by Seruzawa (FABOL - F*** A Bunch Of Liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Looks to me like White Democrats who were never slave owners are fighting White Republicans who were never Nazis over a Confederate statue erected by White Democrats, because democrats can’t stand their own history any more and somehow it’s Trump’s fault?


4 posted on 08/20/2017 10:06:04 AM PDT by NaturalBornConservative ("Something that everyone knows isn't worth knowing" ~ Bernard Baruch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NaturalBornConservative
Both parties have memories:

Republicans have historical memories: of Elizabeth Margaret Chandler, Lucretia Mott, Sarah and Angelina Grimke, Abraham Lincoln, and MLK. We also have the underground railroad and abolitionists.

Democrats have historical memories too: of Robert Byrd (KKK- head of US Senate), Robert E. Lee, Bull Conner, George Wallace, the KKK, and the White Citizens Councils.

...

White democrats WERE the slave owners... of course none of the slave owners are alive today...

And Republicans WERE the people who freed the slaves, but they're not alive today either...

5 posted on 08/20/2017 3:52:59 PM PDT by GOPJ (Start by tearing down statues ...burning books, and eventually you go after people - John Davidson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson