Posted on 07/30/2017 8:36:20 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
“What’s wrong with nuking North Korea?—
“The people in South Korea would be exposed to the fallout.
And Nork artillery ranged in the mountains along the DMZ would reduce Seoul to rubble and kill tens of thousands of South Koreans.
Someone needs to take this ignorant bitch off the air.
What a bunch of crap. The US is not going to incinerate North Korea because they are testing missiles. And to make that stupid an insinuation should be embarrassing, even to them. And a lowly chief of staff whose duties include overseeing the actions of the White House staff, managing the president’s schedule, and deciding who is allowed to meet with the president. Anyone see anything about making decisions on the use of nuclear weapons there?
Factually, his position is determined to exist by the president. There’s no requirement for him. He can be sent packing just as fast he was hired. And disagreeing with Trump is a real good stempmeter.
rwood
Kudos to MSNBC for jamming all their affirmative action hosts and guests into one time slot.
My pleasure. :)
Make the Un wonder and worry.
china’s retaliatory strike that levels every major US population center and first strike capability?
Really think nukes are that peachy keen do you? I’m sure you’re a big talker there in your moms basement.
Oh, yes Captain Communism, please save us!!!! /sarc
So you want to start a nuclear war and kill millions, including allies, with radiation? Jerk.
None of these brainless morons even has a slight clue as to how nuclear command and control and nuclear release works.
They still think there is a red button that the president can unilaterally push to release nuclear weapons.
Doesn’t work that way assholes.
Do some research on the after-affects a few minutes after a nuclear blast.
Correct...That fallout could escalate relationship with China and Russia into a war we don’t want...
Yup, no fooling. Isn't amazing that so many FReeper nuclear physicists aren't aware of, or haven't contemplated this?
If you really consider the capabilities that NK probably actually have (not what the fat little guys says they have), we could probably devastate the place with conventional weapons we have nearby there right now...
I wonder if you could evacuate Seoul in say two days. Get people about another 100 miles away from the border. Fat Boy would be crapping his pants if all the sudden this happened.
Why do we have nukes?
There are some “tactical” nukes that could be used...
Strategic nukes we have serve as a deterrent as much as anything...
Nukes are better to have and not need than to need and not have, don’t you think????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.