Posted on 06/12/2017 9:11:43 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
So the WSJ et al who have spent the better part of the last 18 months blocking anything positive about Trump, now want Twitter to block Trump?!
The Wall Street Journal took to Twitter over the weekend to coyly ask: “When President Trump blocks Twitter followers, does it violate the Constitution?”
What else are WSJ journalists drinking in their all-day coffee break caramel infused frappés and lattés?
No Constitution for you!!
WSJ goes dark side. Murdoch/Soros and global billionaires arm global media and make it possible to literally rule the world— it’s events, famines, economies, it’s war making.
Comey supposedly looked for evidence and could find nothing.
If he had been able to find something he sure as heck would have trumpeted it.
Stopped reading them years ago when their radical open borders editorial policy became apparent. Don’t miss that rag at all.
Bots can be blocked.
Violence, profanity, racism, etc can be blocked
Illegalities can be blocked
Apart from a few editors at the WSJ (Strassel, etc.), there is not a dime’s worth of difference between the WSJ and the NYTs. Their “reporting” is predicated and starts out from a hard-left point of view.
WSJ…still mourning JEB’s failed bid for the nomination. Get over it, fossils!
Just because there’s no evidence of any collusion between Russia and Trump, doesn’t mean we can’t find collusion between Russia and Trump!
He’s also not taking my phone calls!!! Or reading my bloggggg!
Lock him up!
But did he keep you on his Christmas Card list?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.