Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They Have Nothing On Him (POTUS)...
Mononymous1/Wordpress ^ | 4/4/2017 | Mononymous1

Posted on 04/04/2017 10:24:01 AM PDT by mononymous

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
After following some (because I grew tired of it) of the Russian collusion nonsense, I felt compelled to say this. Thanks.
1 posted on 04/04/2017 10:24:01 AM PDT by mononymous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mononymous
Also, the Democrats were counting on winning the election - because they, with the help of their Media allies, would have been able to bury this deep with control of the government.

Of course, it would have been an open secret in The Swamp - but just so the ruling Democrats could laugh at the Republicans, and rub it in as they appointed more black-robed clowns to run the country as a judicial oligarchy.

2 posted on 04/04/2017 10:29:34 AM PDT by kiryandil (Americ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mononymous

Prior to Nov. 8 the espionage of the Trump Team was to dig up dirt to derail his candidacy.
After Nov. 8 it was a false-flag subterfuge operation (just like the Bengahzi YouTube misdirection).


3 posted on 04/04/2017 10:35:27 AM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mononymous
I believe you are a little shortsighted in your conclusion.

You're looking at conviction and incarceration of the guilty individuals. This is where you need to look deeper.Rice and Obama are tips of the Democrat sewer hole. Granted they are at the top of it, but how far down does it go? What members of Congress were privy to the leakage of information they should not have gotten in the first place?

Notice that the CBC has been really quiet about all this except for Maxine 'the Delusional' Waters. How many of the CBC knew about it? How many on BOTH sides of the aisle knew it was going on?

How ever far down this hole this goes, one thing is for certain. ALL the exposure of the corruptness of the Democrats will be on full display. Every official coming up for re-election is going to have to answer for it.Every one of them should be primaried with this debacle front and center used against them during the campaign.

If it goes as far as I believe it does, this could spell the end of the Democrat Party as we know it.

4 posted on 04/04/2017 10:37:01 AM PDT by Wizdum (Buckle up! It's going to be one hell of a ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mononymous
(3) Obama was obviously aware of what was going on here and it was the reason why, with days remaining in office, he authorized the exchange of intelligence between the various agencies. He knew.

He authorized the exchanges because it would then 'muddy the waters' as to where any intel originally came from if it were in all databases at the same time, thus buying them some time to bury and obfuscate even more of their crimes......................................

5 posted on 04/04/2017 10:38:20 AM PDT by Red Badger (Ending a sentence with a preposition is nothing to be afraid of........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wizdum

This could spell the end of the Democrat Party as THEY know it!....................


6 posted on 04/04/2017 10:39:14 AM PDT by Red Badger (Ending a sentence with a preposition is nothing to be afraid of........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mononymous

I think that Obama knew what was going on and he holds most if not all of the answers to this. He knew, and everybody’s trying to cover it up. He’s the one who should be brought before congress.


7 posted on 04/04/2017 10:39:32 AM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wizdum

If Maxine knew about it, and she told all of us she did, then EVERY DEMOCRAT IN CONGRESS AND THEIR AIDES KNEW IT AS WELL................


8 posted on 04/04/2017 10:40:47 AM PDT by Red Badger (Ending a sentence with a preposition is nothing to be afraid of........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mononymous
I would add:

(4) Obama was unconcerned about leaving "bread crumbs" behind, because he expected Hillary Clinton to win.

-PJ

9 posted on 04/04/2017 10:42:31 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

You hit the nail on the head: When you think “your guys” will be in charge forever, you fear nothing and THAT is one of the reasons they are so RABID when it comes to Trump: They don’t own him and they can’t scare him.


10 posted on 04/04/2017 10:44:09 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Maxine isn’t going to spill the beans until they have the Donald in a corner. Her problem will be if she exposes anything EVERYONE will wonder why someone with a low-end clearance has any TS info at all..


11 posted on 04/04/2017 10:46:48 AM PDT by Wizdum (Buckle up! It's going to be one hell of a ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mononymous
Pretty frequently, when the Democrats accuse their opponents of wrongdoing, they're doing it to help conceal their own wrongdoing.

For example, if they accuse you of cheating in an election, it's to conceal their own cheating or to at least make it harder for you to accuse them of cheating. It's kind of a wet blanket used to help prevent your argument from catching fire.

And if they then accuse you of deflecting, it's just to muddle their own deflecting.

If they accuse you of collusion, it's to complicate the issue of their own collusion.

If they accuse you of rigging an election, it's to obfuscate their own election rigging activities.

12 posted on 04/04/2017 10:48:09 AM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wizdum

Maxine has already told us of the AWESOME DATABASE OBAMA had and could use against us. She was bragging about it’s greatness and all encompassing information.................


13 posted on 04/04/2017 10:49:46 AM PDT by Red Badger (Ending a sentence with a preposition is nothing to be afraid of........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wizdum

Wouldn’t surprise me if numerous neocons were/are in on the open secret. Trump is an equal opportunity threat to the status quo.


14 posted on 04/04/2017 10:57:26 AM PDT by Ahithophel (Communication is an art form susceptible to technical failures)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68
Trump demanded that Obama release his birth certificate. When Obama released a phony document, Trump accepted it. He blinked. He had better not blink this time or the Deep State wins.

For the sake of the nation, this all needs to be exposed. At some point the mainstream media will be forced to cover it. The media will try to get people to believe it is all just a distraction from the "treason" of Trump's non-existent "collusion" with Putin.

A lot is at stake, which makes me worry that the Deep State will have Trump taken out if he appears to be on the verge of winning.

15 posted on 04/04/2017 10:58:41 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Then there will be war.

Write their names down. All of them.


16 posted on 04/04/2017 11:00:34 AM PDT by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! And please, God, bless the USA again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Hillary has been known to lament “the politics of personal destruction” when she and Obama, as disciples of Saul Alinsky, have been the greatest practitioners of the art.


17 posted on 04/04/2017 11:00:37 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wizdum
If it goes as far as I believe it does, this could spell the end of the Democrat Party as we know it.

They are terrified that Bernie Sanders or some other Communist folk hero is going to march off with about 35% of their base and start a new Democratic Socialist party. Irrefutable evidence of corruption at this level could be just the thing that causes the final schism.

18 posted on 04/04/2017 11:03:55 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

And I suspect many Republicans knew, also. Remember Nunes said he was aware of the unmasking well before he spoke out on this subject.


19 posted on 04/04/2017 11:16:29 AM PDT by whinecountry (Semper Ubi Sub Ubi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

I think you are absolutely right here.


20 posted on 04/05/2017 5:55:59 AM PDT by mononymous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson