[Doogle]

....almost as fake as CNN

[marktwain]

Fun, but does not make much sense as a weapon. You still need a camera with a cross hair or other sights registered to the gun on the drone.

If you have to be close enough to watch both the drone and the targets to make it work, it loses a great deal of effectiveness.

Still, It is a clear direction we are moving toward. Imagine such a drone with good optics. You operate it from a fox hole without exposing yourself. It seeks out the enemy, either to draw fire to expose their position, or to take them out. Every infantry man will want his own personal ground support drone.

Now imagine a coordianted constellatin of them working with a company of infantry. Best of all, they are cheap. For the price of one A-10 Warthog, you get 2,000 drones.

They are just the thing for low level warfare.

[bigbob]

Coming soon to a public event near you...

[G Larry]

did you see where the gun was pointed when he turned to talk to the camera after taking out the first group?

[myerson]

Submachine guns use pistol ammo. It takes a HP rifle to detonate Tannerite.

[Lazamataz]

Pure BS. If you look at the so-called ‘machine gun’ it consists of a portion of an AR upper, only.

[JoeFromSidney]

This is something that could be manufactured easily. Rebels and insurgents would quickly find uses for it.

[rlmorel]

"Someone hates these mannequins!"

[Kickass Conservative]

Hope our Guys have a good Skeet Shooter armed with a nice Beretta Shotgun in the Squad.