Seattle Judge is Wrong and Overreached With Nationwide Injunction on Travel Ban
“Second-guessing Trump’s decision is for elections, not judges. The Supreme Court long ago rejected such second-guessing as impermissible. The Boston’s judge’s thoughtful and deliberate decision follows the precedents, as the law compels. The Seattle judge’s decision tries to substitute for the legislative branches, which the law condemns.”
Did ya catch that? This federal judge basically made a ruling on what he THOUGHT Trump meant- which is clearly against the law- a judge can not just rule based on guesses about motive- just as hearsay isn’t allowed in courts- neither is second guessing someone’s motives-
This judge clearly overstepped his authority and should be reprimanded somehow- perhaps impeached- to send a loud clear message that if you are a judge- you had better stick to hte law or there will be consequences-
These guys also see the words “privacy” and “musket” in the Constitution. Apparently they have the ability to see things that aren’t really there, and make up new rules based on their superpower vision. Tough combo to beat. Each battle must be fought and won.
...........a “reprimand” to a judge in legal circles is
known as a “mandamus”..........see below:
Mandamus (”We command”) is a judicial remedy in the form of an order from a superior court, to any government subordinate court, corporation, or public authority—to do (or forbear from doing) some specific act which that body is obliged under law to do (or refrain from doing)—and which is in the nature of public duty, ...own as a “mandamus”............