Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Brian Griffin

However the federal government is not empowered to dictate what insurance — or anything else for that matter — you have to purchase with your own money — and states remain the appropriate political arena for health care questions


20 posted on 01/13/2017 11:34:19 AM PST by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: faithhopecharity

The federal government can reduce subsidies by Article I Section 8 rules it is explicitly empowered to write every bit as much as it can reduce income taxes by granting mortgage interest deductions.


22 posted on 01/13/2017 11:41:30 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: faithhopecharity

The federal government can reduce subsidies by Article I Section 8 rules it is explicitly empowered to write every bit as much as it can reduce income taxes by granting mortgage interest deductions.


23 posted on 01/13/2017 11:41:34 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: faithhopecharity

“the federal government is not empowered to dictate what insurance — or anything else for that matter — you have to purchase with your own money”

The federal government didn’t force me to buy a house in 1982 by having a mortgage interest deduction, but it made a financially convincing case with a tax rate of ~35%.

The federal government drives the housing market.

Is that good? No, in my opinion.

Is it Constitutional? Renters paying $1,000s/year more have never won a case.


25 posted on 01/13/2017 11:50:38 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: faithhopecharity

“the federal government is not empowered to dictate what insurance — or anything else for that matter — you have to purchase with your own money”

The federal government didn’t force me to buy a house in 1982 by having a mortgage interest deduction, but it made a financially convincing case with a tax rate of ~35%.

The federal government drives the housing market.

Is that good? No, in my opinion.

Is it Constitutional? Renters paying $1,000s/year more have never won a case.


26 posted on 01/13/2017 11:50:39 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson