Posted on 01/07/2017 11:56:46 AM PST by knarf
22 minutes of "you were ready for this"
Isn’t she member of the Constitution Party?
If she is, I may be in the wrong party.
I came across her about six or eight months ago, starting listening to her and like how she explains things.
The Fed has first dibs on the income of all legitimate wage-earners in the nation - a blood-letting that tyrannizes the citizenry and will eventually destroy the nation.
Tax is the drug of choice of governments and, like all addicts, will destroy itself and us with it.
Subscribe to her daily's
I too discovered Krisanne less than a year ago and have not heard such clear explications of the Constitution, usually in the words of framers and founders. A biochemist from a working class Democrat family who worked a Monsanto but decided to fight after 9/11, became SIGNINT Russian intelligence agent when Army Language School was oversubscribed for Arabic students. After being injured while working in Russian Intelligence she married another intelligence agent, went to law school and worked for ten years in Florida’s AG office as a prosecutor.
Want to learn what you didn’t know about what authorities the House, Senate, president, courts legally have? She teaches all ages gratis 200+ times each year, probably influenced by her husband who is a preacher. She has no fear of legislators to whom she often explains the law by citing law accurately and often quoting its framers. She has a daily radio program which has no equal, both at Krisannehall.com and on YouTube.com. Instead of bloviating like the self-anointed constitutional “experts” famous more for calling people dopes, a tactic which usually betrays ignorance. Krisanne explains Article 5 and cites historical provenance, always encouraging others to read the sources. She criticizes some whom I would have welcomed as my commander like Alan West because she is more concerned with liberty than defense. She would probably explain that without liberty what is there to defend! You or I might disagree, but you will understand her reasoning and that is a rare quality.
I am surprised that Obama/Clinton/Lerner have not gone after her as they did to Catherine Engelbrecht for investigating the joke of integrity of our voting protocols. Krisanne’s latest direction, which is only possible because of her excellent grasp of the constitutional law she realized only after mastering the law school curriculum wasn’t taught or even provided at her law school. Krisanne’s energy and curiosity betray a deeper understanding of law than you’ll hear in the lectures being provided by Harvard, Yale, Stanford, U of Virginia, ... Federal funding and big government have infected most law schools, and even Hillsdale, which avoided and still avoids the politically volatile issues, in spite of their claim to be independent because they don’t accept federal money.
Supreme Court possibility?
Thank you for that precise description.
I attempted to get my superintendent to invite her to a school auditorium, but she said no.
It wouldn’t bother me, but she’s more powerful and effective out in the public.
That is the vital distinction - to rule yourself or defer to the mob.
Perhaps we should rename "republic" to 'me-public" or even "iPUB" to better relate to the millennials.< /SNARC>
bookmark
One definition of “addiction” is the need to continuously increase the dose...
In that regard, as we can readily see, your “drug of choice” analogy is an apt one...
Clearly, there is no level of taxation that will sate Leviathan’s appetite for our produce...
Well said...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.